BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Each of the fallen soldiers

Expert replies
by sameerballani » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:13 am
Each of the fallen soldiers - Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - were hard workers, very different from the soldiers that remained to guard the hospital.

A. Each of the fallen soldiers - Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - were hard workers
B. Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - each of them fallen soldiers - were hard workers
C. The fallen soldiers - Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - were all hard workers

[spoiler]OA:Later[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by HSPA » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:30 am
C for me
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by ov25 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:44 am
C, by all means for clarity purposes
Join the discussion

by divya23 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:05 am
imo c
Join the discussion

by VivianKerr » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:23 am
When we see two dashes in a sentence like this, we can think of the information between them as an appositive phrase and mentally eliminate it. The rest of the sentence must make sense. Pay close attention to subject-verb agreement.

"Each" is singular and cannot go with "were", so A and B can be eliminated. The answer is C.

This is another similar question:

Each of Hemingway's wives - Hadley Richardson. Pauline Pfeiffer. Martha Gelhom. and Mary Welsh - were strong and interesting women, very different from the often pallid women who populate his novels.

(A) Each of Hemingway's wives - Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh - were strong and interesting women,

(B) Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh - each of them Hemingway's wives - were strong and, interesting women,

(C) Hemingway's wives - Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh - were all strong and interesting women,

(D) Strong and interesting women - Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh - each a wife of Hemingway, was

(E) Strong and interesting women - Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh - every one of Hemingway's wives were

OA: C
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion

by sameerballani » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:52 am
VivianKerr wrote:When we see two dashes in a sentence like this, we can think of the information between them as an appositive phrase and mentally eliminate it. The rest of the sentence must make sense. Pay close attention to subject-verb agreement.

"Each" is singular and cannot go with "were", so A and B can be eliminated. The answer is C.

Why B is eliminated?
If we remove what is mentioned in between the dashes, we get -

Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - each of them fallen soldiers - were hard workers

Don't we have plural subject here? Please guide.
Also, don't you think there should be a comma before Bob

Thanks

Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:10 am
Hi vivian,

i have a confusion in your reasoning for Op B, please clear.
"Each" is singular and cannot go with "were", so A and B can be eliminated. The answer is C.
for Op A its okay but in Op B

Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - each of them fallen soldiers - were hard workers

Here i think the subject is "Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay" and correctly associated with plural verb "were"...moreover i think, the part in between "-" is a modifier...there may be some other reason to eliminate Op B or m applying wrong concept here???
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:31 am
atulmangal wrote:Hi vivian,

i have a confusion in your reasoning for Op B, please clear.
"Each" is singular and cannot go with "were", so A and B can be eliminated. The answer is C.
for Op A its okay but in Op B

Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - each of them fallen soldiers - were hard workers

Here i think the subject is "Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay" and correctly associated with plural verb "were"...moreover i think, the part in between "-" is a modifier...there may be some other reason to eliminate Op B or m applying wrong concept here???
Hi,
Good point.
B would be correct if we change it as follows:
Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - each of them a fallen soldier - were hard workers.
(or)
Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - all of them fallen soldiers - were hard workers
I believe that was the mistake in B.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:44 am
Frankenstein wrote:
atulmangal wrote:Hi vivian,

i have a confusion in your reasoning for Op B, please clear.
"Each" is singular and cannot go with "were", so A and B can be eliminated. The answer is C.
for Op A its okay but in Op B

Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - each of them fallen soldiers - were hard workers

Here i think the subject is "Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay" and correctly associated with plural verb "were"...moreover i think, the part in between "-" is a modifier...there may be some other reason to eliminate Op B or m applying wrong concept here???
Hi,
Good point.
B would be correct if we change it as follows:
Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - each of them a fallen soldier - were hard workers.
(or)
Henry Johnson, Paul Rider, Brent Hall and Bob McCay - all of them fallen soldiers - were hard workers
I believe that was the mistake in B.
100% correct, this is the reasoning i was expecting...the original official question which Vivian posted is from OG-10, and i remember Og gives the same explanation why Op B is incorrect. Great!!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1