pzazz12 wrote:thank u.. but can u explain me little bit clear..........
Well, I don´t know which part(s) you found confusing/difficult, pzazz12, therefore I will say somethings about my solution and, if not enough, I will wait for your specific questions!
The beauty of the problem is the fact that you cannot deal with the proportions without care, because you must understand (as Rahul said at the begining of his post) that the alloy is MADE of two substances only, and therefore if you (say) take some grams of N of S to combine with some grams of N of T, you have to "respect" the number of grams taken from S and T in the other components of each substance, to "preserve" the proportions in which these components are presented in their corresponding substances. (I know, too much "wording" in all these, but this "philosophy" is what motivates my approach...)
Please note that I´ve decided to force K to be 6g in S because I knew that T had 0g of this component, so it would be great to have 6g of K (6+0) at the end, where I really have 6g of K in the allow *PER 100g of alloy*! This last words are in "bold" because to have 6g of K (in S) at first, I had to use JUST 40g of S, but at the end I must have 6g of K in the alloy, therefore I understand that I have to "fill" with T what it takes to come out to 100g of alloy, and that means 60g of T, for sure, and that´s the second forcing.
The "premium" someone gets from doing this problem this way is not only the triviallity of the (only one) equation that solves the problem, but also because it is very easy to understand that it (the equation) must be satisfied. In other words, you are rewarded because you created a proper "structure" for the problem to be dealt with.
The problem is beautiful and I guess (no humble talk here) my solution attacks it beautifully...I hope you understand (and like) it, too.
Regards,
Fabio.