BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

algebraic method needed

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by sgarnepudi » Sat Nov 08, 2008 10:15 pm
let fathers age is 10x+y and sons age is 10y+x

Ages an year ago are F = 10x+y-1 and S = 10y+x-1
F-S = 9x-9y which is equal to the age of the son i.e.
9x-9y = 10y+x-1 => 8x-19y+1=0 .. substitute values in x and y to make the total 0 and it happens at y=3 and x=7

so F=73 and S=37
Join the discussion

by c_numb » Sat Nov 08, 2008 10:44 pm
thanks
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Sun Nov 09, 2008 12:03 am
substitute values in x and y to make the total 0 and it happens at y=3 and x=7


is there any other way other ten guessing numbers...


can we form one more equation????
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Sun Nov 09, 2008 12:30 am
raunekk wrote:
substitute values in x and y to make the total 0 and it happens at y=3 and x=7


is there any other way other ten guessing numbers...


can we form one more equation????

cant think of any.. at this time. However, you could use the answer choices to figure out the answer, starting from D.

HT Helps
-V
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Sun Nov 09, 2008 1:35 am
nice qn !

Solved till 8x-19y+1=0 & started wondering ! :D
Join the discussion

by cartera » Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:31 am
sgarnepudi wrote:let fathers age is 10x+y and sons age is 10y+x

Ages an year ago are F = 10x+y-1 and S = 10y+x-1
F-S = 9x-9y which is equal to the age of the son i.e.
9x-9y = 10y+x-1 => 8x-19y+1=0 .. substitute values in x and y to make the total 0 and it happens at y=3 and x=7

so F=73 and S=37
But it says a year ago, the father was twice as ols as his son, so it should be:

10x+y-1=20y+2x-1; 8x=21y, how do you solve this?
Join the discussion

Re: algebraic method needed

by vivek.kapoor83 » Sun Nov 09, 2008 7:06 am
c_numb wrote:If you reverse the digits of my age, you have the age of my son. A year ago, I was twice his age. How old are we both now?

To be honest ...the fastest way to solve is..try to put the choices and u ll be able to slove it fastest. Rather than assuming present age etc.
Pick each choice and see if that choice completes the above condition.
Join the discussion

by c_numb » Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:49 am
v.kapoor - u are right.
Join the discussion