BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Algebra Sequence & Series

Expert replies
by and1ms238 » Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:41 am
This problem comes from OG 12 #45.

If r is a constant and an=an for all positive integers n, for how many values of n is an<100?

(1) a50 = 500
(2) a100 + A105 = 2,050

NOTE: an is read as function of n... in essence... f(n)

My questions is what is the GMACs definition of value? I went through this problem assuming that value can be a rational number as well... not just an integer.

The answer is D: each statement ALONE is sufficient. And the reasoning is that n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. My reasoning is that you can not determine the exact values because the EXACT value are infinite... assuming rational numbers. Am I way off? Someone just help me through the reasoning of this problem. I was able to figure out the problem algebraically and get that r = 10.. but just could not grasp my mind around "For How Many Values of N..."

Thank you.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by papgust » Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:38 pm
If r is a constant and an=r*n for all positive integers n, for how many values of n is an<100?

(1) a50 = 500
(2) a100 + A105 = 2,050


Firstly, you have transcribed the question incorrectly. It is an = r*n.

ok, so coming to the question. For how many values of n is an < 100?

1. a50 = 500

a50 = r * n. You know that n is 50.
a50 = r * 50 = 500. So, r = 10.

Now, calculate the value of an as 100.
a10 = 10 * 10 = 100
This is of the form,
an = r * n

So, for an to be < 100, n can take 9 values because a10 equals 100. Question asks for < 100.

Sufficient.

2. a100 + A105 = 2,050

Same logic as statement I. Sufficient to answer.

Hence, D
Join the discussion

by and1ms238 » Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:23 pm
Yes, I understand how to get there. In my practice, I calculated that correctly. But I was under the impression that *value* in the question's stem " for how many values of n is an<100?" includes all rational numbers.

So my question is: Are all 'values' considered integers? I thought all values included rational numbers. Therefore, I assumed that it would be insufficient since the number of 'values' would be infinite.

Do you understand my question? Sorry if I'm not too clear.
Join the discussion

by shashank.ism » Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:14 am
and1ms238 wrote:This problem comes from OG 12 #45.

If r is a constant and an=an for all positive integers n, for how many values of n is an<100?

(1) a50 = 500
(2) a100 + A105 = 2,050

NOTE: an is read as function of n... in essence... f(n)

My questions is what is the GMACs definition of value? I went through this problem assuming that value can be a rational number as well... not just an integer.

The answer is D: each statement ALONE is sufficient. And the reasoning is that n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. My reasoning is that you can not determine the exact values because the EXACT value are infinite... assuming rational numbers. Am I way off? Someone just help me through the reasoning of this problem. I was able to figure out the problem algebraically and get that r = 10.. but just could not grasp my mind around "For How Many Values of N..."

Thank you.
My Websites:
www.mba.webmaggu.com - India's social Network for MBA Aspirants

www.deal.webmaggu.com -India's online discount, coupon, free stuff informer.

www.dictionary.webmaggu.com - A compact free online dictionary with images.

Nothing is Impossible, even Impossible says I'm possible.
Join the discussion

by harsh.champ » Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:19 am
and1ms238 wrote:Yes, I understand how to get there. In my practice, I calculated that correctly. But I was under the impression that *value* in the question's stem " for how many values of n is an<100?" includes all rational numbers.

So my question is: Are all 'values' considered integers? I thought all values included rational numbers. Therefore, I assumed that it would be insufficient since the number of 'values' would be infinite.

Do you understand my question? Sorry if I'm not too clear.
Hey just read this part frm the ques:-
If r is a constant and an=an for all positive integers n, for how many values of n is an<100?
It is written that the equation is only valid for all +ve integers.
Hence,the answer would not be infinite.

Hope you get the point.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P
Join the discussion