Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Algebra Basic rules

Expert replies
by lucas211 » Mon Aug 04, 2014 6:21 pm
Hello everybody.

I am starting to study for the GMAT test and right now I am looking at the algebra section, in which I seem have some fundamental misunderstanding, so hope you are able to guide me a bit.

I am having trouble solving the following question:

Determine the value of x as specifically as possible by manipulating the inequalities:

0>x and –(1/x)> 17

When I am trying to manipulate the second inequality I would do the following:

1) multiply with x on each side to get:
-1> 17x

2) divide by 17 on each side to get:
-(1/17)> x

in the meantime when I see the correct result is says:
-(1/17)<x

Could anybody please help giving me some directions.

Thanks in advance

Lucas
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GMATinsight » Mon Aug 04, 2014 7:23 pm
lucas211 wrote: Determine the value of x as specifically as possible by manipulating the inequalities:

0>x and –(1/x)> 17


Lucas
Solve : 0>x and –(1/x)> 17

Given 0 > x i.e. x is Negative

Now Solving : –(1/x)> 17

Step 1: Multiply (x) on both Sides and Reverse the Inequality Sign because the multiplier 'x' is negative

(x)*[–(1/x)] < 17*(x)
i.e. (-1) < 17x

Step 2: Divide both Sides by (17)
(-1)/17 < 17x/17
(-1/17) < x
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
Join the discussion

by lucas211 » Mon Aug 11, 2014 5:18 am
Hi again.

First of all sorry for my late reply ( I am travelling in Brazil and am struggeling with internet-connection sometimes :-)

Thanks for the reply, which I have a further question to:

If we multiply the equation by negative ´x`on each side, shouldnt the other side of the equation become -17x and +1 on the first side of the equation?

Thanks a lot in advance.

Lucas
Join the discussion

by GMATinsight » Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:06 am
lucas211 wrote:Hi again.

First of all sorry for my late reply ( I am travelling in Brazil and am struggeling with internet-connection sometimes :-)

Thanks for the reply, which I have a further question to:

If we multiply the equation by negative ´x`on each side, shouldnt the other side of the equation become -17x and +1 on the first side of the equation?

Thanks a lot in advance.

Lucas
Please check the statement that I haeve Underlined in my previous comment.

We haven't multiplied Negative x on both sides instead we have multiplied x on both sides which happens to be a negative value and Since it's Negative therefore multiplying x is equivalent to multiplying a negative number therefore it changes the sign of Inequality.

Alternative to check whether your result is correct or not

Pick a number and check if it satisfies the given equation
:)
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
Join the discussion

by lucas211 » Thu Aug 14, 2014 7:33 am
Thank you very much :-)
Join the discussion

by lucas211 » Thu Aug 14, 2014 7:35 am
Thank you very much :-)
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Thu Aug 14, 2014 1:46 pm
Just to follow up here, Lucas, one way you can think about this:

Most people read "-x" as "x is negative", but it really should be read as (-1) * x.

The expression -x doesn't mean that x is a negative number: it means that you're taking x, whatever it is, and multiplying it by -1; in other words, changing the sign.

For instance, if x = -3, then -x = -(-3), or (-1)*(-3), or 3.
Join the discussion

by diegocml » Wed Apr 27, 2016 5:49 am
I'm so glad I've found this thread and I'd be grateful if someone could correct me if I'm wrong.

Also, apologies if my question is a bit off topic.

Is it correct to say that:

1) negative^even = positive ==> i.e.: -2^2 = 4

2) (negative)^even = positive ==> (-2)^2 = 4

3) -(negative)^even = negative ==> -(-2)^2 = -4 ==> If I'm not mistaken this example goes more or less in line with what Matt explained above.

Thanks a lot for your help and time.
Diego
Diego

1st GMAT attemp: 410 (Q18 V27)
2nd GMAT attemp: 490 (Q35 V23)
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Apr 27, 2016 8:19 am
Hi Diego,

You're asking about 'order of operations', which is sometimes referred to as PEMDAS. It's the 'order' in which you have to perform a calculation:

Parentheses
------
Exponents
------
Multiplication
Division
-----
Addition
Subtraction

You perform any calculation in a parentheses first, then any calculation involving an exponent. From there, multiplication and division are on the same 'level', so you do them from 'left to right' through the calculation. Finally, addition and subtraction are on the same 'level', and you do them last (from left to right through the calculation).

When dealing with negative numbers and exponents, you have to be very careful about whether you're dealing with parentheses or not...

(-2)^2 = (-2)(-2) = +4
-2^2 = (-1)(2)(2) = -4

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion