@NRNight reader wrote:Before I start judging others I let the others judge me in advance.
@gmatmachoman: why don't you quit your meaningless thinking of GMAT score as some one's intelligence level indicator. There's tempting feeling to think that if one scores 300 or 400 that person is AN IDIOT or one crossing 700-level is A GENIUS. That's just not true. Responding on your naming my GMAT experience "debacle" I have registered for GMAT 28th March retake and should be sending my unofficial PDF report with the score of YOUR DREAM (I promise) to your mail if you like. Also if my pic scares you - that's not too macho! Let's have a deal. If you change your name in this forum - because macho and man are the same sort of things, man+man - I will post new pic. Are you having some problems because of masculinity, your name suggests for having ones - extra desire for man+man.
@Target: do we need to interpret logically what is not supposed to be known by a test-taker - personal names and places? These must be introduced by the examiner and not interpreted by us. Here, Agatha Christie is implied as the writer/novelist by you and MGMAT test writer.
@Atulmangal: you started explaining something then proceeded with that "I won't agree with your points". BUT there was no point made by yourself. You have just followed Target with the logical interpretation hint, which is not required at all.
All the best to you guys! I am out of this forum through March 28, my G Day. As you may observe I am leading our community WELL ENOUGH and should be doing so without EVEN participating here for the next two weeks.
Cheers
All the best buddy....Do well
