BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Additional funding for the town library

Expert replies
by gmatdriller » Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:30 am
Mayor: The city council has proposed additional funding for the town library. However, the library's own studies show that fewer than 10% of town residents use the library. The city council claims that the library is underutilized because the books, electronic media, and computer equipment are outdated, and that if these were updated, more residents would use the library. However, the last time the town allocated additional funding to the library, usage of the library did not increase. Therefore the town should not allocate additional funding for the library.

Which of the following most seriously weakens the mayor's argument?

A: Many of the patrons who do use the library are dissatisfied with the library's resources.
B: The last time the town allocated additional funding for the library, the funding was used to repair the crumbling staircase and ramp leading to the library entrance.
C: Many residents report that they would use the library if the parking lot were to be enlarged.
D: A large percentage of library users are children and teens, who do not vote or pay taxes.
E: Usage of the library did increase in 1994, when the town voted to allocate funds for an advertising campaign promoting reading.

E says the last time funding was provided there was an increase in library usage; wouldn't that hurt
the proposition that increasing funds will have no effect on library usage?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by user123321 » Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:46 am
IMO B

the council thought that the funds the yprovided earlier were used to update the outdated ones in the library. But choice B says it was used to repair the staircase. hence IMO it weakens the argument.

user123321
Just started my preparation :D
Want to do it right the first time.
Join the discussion

by sk8legend408 » Tue Nov 22, 2011 9:06 am
IMO B
The argument against the mayor's is that "the books, electronic media, and computer equipment are outdated, and that if these were updated" more of the city's residents would visit the library.

The mayor then says that funds were allocated but there was no increase in usage of the library.

If B were true, it would attack the mayor's argument thus weakening it.
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:42 pm
increase in fund for the purpose meant will likely increase usage because the last
disbursement for used for something else. So, agreed, B weakens the argument.
Join the discussion