• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations
• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote According to public health officials This topic has 2 expert replies and 2 member replies Top Member According to public health officials According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than under it. A. than B. than born C. than they were D. than there had been E. than had been born What is wrong with other options? OA A GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 04 Oct 2017 Posted: 551 messages Followed by: 11 members Upvotes: 180 Top Reply Hello! I think the best way to understand which answer makes the most sense is to replace the word "it" with what that word is referring to - the age of thirty. So let's write out each answer after we make this quick change, and see what we have: A. According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than under the age of thirty. This one is the best answer because it's clear we're comparing women over 30 to women under 30, rather than comparing the babies being born to women over/under 30. It also uses parallel structure, which makes this easier to understand. B. According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than born under the age of thirty. This one is wrong because it oddly suggests the babies were born under the age of 30, which is true, but not really the point. It leaves out who gave birth to the babies! It would have been okay to say "...than born to women under the age of thirty," which makes it clearer who is doing the birthing! C. According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than they were under the age of thirty. This one doesn't really make sense when you read it out loud. It kind of suggests that in Massachusetts, there were more women over the age of 30 than under the age of 30, which is not what we're talking about - we're talking about the number of babies being born, not mothers who existed at the time. D. According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than there had been under the age of thirty. Again, this answer is trying to compare how many women existed at the time who were over/under the age of 30, and not comparing the number of babies being born to each group. It also just sounds overly wordy and awkward. E. According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than had been born under the age of thirty. E has the same problem as B - it suggests the babies were born under the age of 30, not that the women who gave birth to them were! It would have been fine if they added in the women to the phrase and said something like "...than had been born to women under the age of thirty." For the most part, this questions has to do with using parallel structure - and what goes wrong with meaning if we don't use parallel structure. I hope this explanation helps clear things up, and gives you a better idea of how to answer questions like this in the future! I'm available if you'd like any follow up. _________________ GMAT Prep From The Economist We offer 70+ point score improvement money back guarantee. Our average student improves 98 points. Free 7-Day Test Prep with Economist GMAT Tutor - Receive free access to the top-rated GMAT prep course including a 1-on-1 strategy session, 2 full-length tests, and 5 ask-a-tutor messages. Get started now. Top Member Moderator Joined 07 Sep 2017 Posted: 2841 messages Followed by: 6 members EconomistGMATTutor wrote: Hello! I think the best way to understand which answer makes the most sense is to replace the word "it" with what that word is referring to - the age of thirty. So let's write out each answer after we make this quick change, and see what we have: A. According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than under the age of thirty. This one is the best answer because it's clear we're comparing women over 30 to women under 30, rather than comparing the babies being born to women over/under 30. It also uses parallel structure, which makes this easier to understand. B. According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than born under the age of thirty. This one is wrong because it oddly suggests the babies were born under the age of 30, which is true, but not really the point. It leaves out who gave birth to the babies! It would have been okay to say "...than born to women under the age of thirty," which makes it clearer who is doing the birthing! C. According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than they were under the age of thirty. This one doesn't really make sense when you read it out loud. It kind of suggests that in Massachusetts, there were more women over the age of 30 than under the age of 30, which is not what we're talking about - we're talking about the number of babies being born, not mothers who existed at the time. D. According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than there had been under the age of thirty. Again, this answer is trying to compare how many women existed at the time who were over/under the age of 30, and not comparing the number of babies being born to each group. It also just sounds overly wordy and awkward. E. According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than had been born under the age of thirty. E has the same problem as B - it suggests the babies were born under the age of 30, not that the women who gave birth to them were! It would have been fine if they added in the women to the phrase and said something like "...than had been born to women under the age of thirty." For the most part, this questions has to do with using parallel structure - and what goes wrong with meaning if we don't use parallel structure. I hope this explanation helps clear things up, and gives you a better idea of how to answer questions like this in the future! I'm available if you'd like any follow up. Thanks a lot! Legendary Member Joined 25 Sep 2015 Posted: 678 messages Followed by: 5 members Upvotes: 14 BTGmoderatorDC wrote: According to public health officials, in 1998 Massachusetts became the first state in which more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than under it. A. than B. than born C. than they were D. than there had been E. than had been born What is wrong with other options? OA A Dear GMAtGuru, In OA, there is ellipsis implied as follows: more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than [babies were born to women] under it.[it=refers to age of thirty]. In choice C, could ellipsis be correct as follows: more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than they were [born to women] under it. Here, if consider no pronoun ambiguity so they refers to babies. Also, were is correctly used as it appears in the first clause so the verb structure and tense are correct. All other words are implied in the second clause. The only thing i suspect is that were born should be treated as one unit i.e. either to be mentioned together in the second clause or to be omitted together. If we consider they refers to women, then the meaning becomes nonsocial. So where do I go wrong with my interpretation of choice C? I agree that A is shorter and direct. Thanks in advance GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 25 May 2010 Posted: 15309 messages Followed by: 1863 members Upvotes: 13060 GMAT Score: 790 Mo2men wrote: So where do I go wrong with my interpretation of choice C? Incorrect: More babies were born in 1900 than they were born in 1800. Here, the usage of they implies that the SAME BABIES born in 1900 were also born in 1800 -- a nonsensical meaning. Generally: When a comparison begins with MORE/FEWER + SUBJECT + VERB, the implied clause after than should NOT include a pronoun such as they or those. Correct: More babies were born in 1900 than in 1800. Fewer babies were born in 1800 than in 1900. For this reason, the usage of they in C is incorrect. _________________ Mitch Hunt Private Tutor for the GMAT and GRE GMATGuruNY@gmail.com If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon. Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance. For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com. Student Review #1 Student Review #2 Student Review #3 Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now. • Free Trial & Practice Exam BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Practice Test & Review How would you score if you took the GMAT Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5 Day FREE Trial Study Smarter, Not Harder Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5-Day Free Trial 5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Get 300+ Practice Questions 25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • FREE GMAT Exam Know how you'd score today for$0

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

Top First Responders*

1 Ian Stewart 66 first replies
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow 53 first replies
3 Jay@ManhattanReview 51 first replies
4 GMATGuruNY 27 first replies
5 ceilidh.erickson 20 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

192 posts
2 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

94 posts
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

89 posts
4 Ian Stewart

GMATiX Teacher

72 posts
5 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

70 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts