BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolute Values : if x<0

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by dumb.doofus » Tue May 19, 2009 3:43 pm
One love, one blood, one life. You got to do what you should.
https://dreambigdreamhigh.blocked/
https://gmattoughies.blocked/
Join the discussion

by wally » Tue May 19, 2009 5:18 pm
Thanks for the response dumb.doofus, I appreciate it but I can't follow your logic. You are making some 'logic jumps' that I don't understand.

[quote="dumb.doofus"]
Let's say x = -2
so for x < 0, |x| = -x

therefore root(-x|x|) = root(-(-2)(-(-2)) = root(4) = 2

So root(-x|x|) = 2

but x = -2, so therefore root(-x|x|) = 2 = -x and that's the answer..

[/quote="dumb.doofus"]

1) for x <0, |x| = -x ?
Aren't absolute values always greater than 0?
Therefore how is |x| = -x ?
I understand |-x| = x and |x| = x but not |x| = -x.

2) All of sudden there seems to be an additional sign appearing in your root equation.

[quote="dumb.doofus"]root(-(-2)(-(-2))[/quote="dumb.doofus"]

I think the usage of brackets is causing confusion.

How do you get |-2| = (-(-2))?
Do you mean |-2| = (-|-2|)?
Or do you mean |-2| = |-2| = 2?

3) Can you please elaborate on the step:

[quote="dumb.doofus"]
but x = -2, so therefore root(-x|x|) = 2 = -x and that's the answer.[/quote="dumb.doofus"]

You've just proved that when x = -2 the expression sqrt(-x|x|) = 2.
Then you say, BUT x=-2 (which we've just evaluated), so therefore its something else? Can you please explicitly state the logic that has lead you to this conclusion.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by dumb.doofus » Tue May 19, 2009 9:37 pm
Alrighty Wally.. I'll explain to you everything one by one...

1. The absolute value of x, denoted "| x |" (and which is read as "the absolute value of x"), is the distance of x from zero. This is why absolute value is never negative; absolute value only asks "how far?", not "in which direction?". This means not only that | 3 | = 3, because 3 is three units to the right of zero, but also that | –3 | = 3, because –3 is three units to the left of zero.
When x > 0, |x| = x, because x is positive.. and therefore that is the distance from 0
When x < 0, |x| = -x.. because x is negative and we want a positive distance... let's say x is -2, so by the above equation.. |x| = -x, since x = -2, the equation becomes, |x| = -(-2) = 2 which is the distance from 0.
You can read more about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_value

2. Here x = -2 so |x| = -x and so -(-2)..

3. After solving the equation, we found that sqrt(-x|x|) = 2, but we already know that x = -2 or I can write this equation after multiplying by a minus sign as -x = 2..
and that's what I have written.. since the answer is 2.. that is equal to -x

Hope this clarifies..
One love, one blood, one life. You got to do what you should.
https://dreambigdreamhigh.blocked/
https://gmattoughies.blocked/
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Wed May 20, 2009 3:26 am
the easiest way to solve this problem is to PLUG IN NUMBERS, a technique that eliminates the need for all this algebraic flailing-around.

they tell you that x < 0, so select a random negative number for x. just don't pick x = -1, since that makes (a) and (c) the same, and also makes (b) and (d) the same.

let's pick x = -2.

then -x|x| is +2 times +2, or 4. the square root of this is 2. so, answer = 2.

the answer choices are (a) 2, (b) -1, (c) 1, (d) -2, (e) doesn't exist.

thus (a).
done.

--

it should be noted that you can kill (b) and (d) on the basis of observing that square roots can't be negative (as these choices are negative), and you can kill (e) by noticing that, if x is negative, then &#8730;x doesn't exist at all.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion