BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

integers

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

integers

by fskilnik@GMATH » Tue Sep 04, 2018 1:17 pm
vaibhav101 wrote:Is the integer n odd?

1) n is divisible by 3.
2) 2n is divisible by twice as many integers as n.
All nonzero integers are divisors of zero, therefore statement (2) would not have sense.
(Cardinality - in particular dealing with "infinity sizes" - is out-of-GMAT´s scope.)

We will assume that n is positive without loss of generality.
(Reason: m is a factor of n if, and only if, m is a factor of the opposite of n.)

(1) Insufficient:

> If n = 3 , we have YES
> If n = 6 , we have NO

(2) Sufficient: this statement is equivalent to saying that n is odd, as we shall see below:

> If n = 1 , n has 2 factors (1, -1) and 2n=2 has 4 factors (1, -1, 2, -2) , hence n=1 satisfies (2) and is odd.
> If n is odd and greater than 1, n may be written as a product of odd primes, and we have:
\[n \geqslant 3\,\,\,{\text{odd}}\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered}
n = {p_1}^{{k_{\,1}}} \cdot {p_2}^{{k_{\,2}}} \cdot \ldots \cdot {p_m}^{{k_{\,m}}}\,\,\,\,,\,\,\,3 \leqslant {p_1} < {p_2} < \ldots < {p_m}\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,2\left[ {\left( {{k_1} + 1} \right)\left( {{k_2} + 1} \right) \ldots \left( {{k_m} + 1} \right)} \right]\,\,{\text{factors}} \hfill \\
2n = 2 \cdot {p_1}^{{k_{\,1}}} \cdot {p_2}^{{k_{\,2}}} \cdot \ldots \cdot {p_m}^{{k_{\,m}}}\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,2\left[ {\left( {1 + 1} \right)\left[ {\left( {{k_1} + 1} \right)\left( {{k_2} + 1} \right) \ldots \left( {{k_m} + 1} \right)} \right]} \right] = 4\left[ {\left( {{k_1} + 1} \right)\left( {{k_2} + 1} \right) \ldots \left( {{k_m} + 1} \right)} \right]\,\,{\text{factors}} \hfill \\
\end{gathered} \right.\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left( 2 \right)\,\,\,{\text{satisfied}}\]

> If n=2 , n has 4 factors (1,-1,2,-2) but 2n=4 has "only" 6 factors (1, -1, 2, -2, 4, -4) , hence n=2 does not satisfy (2).

> If n is even and greater than 2, we may write: n = (2^k)*M, where M is odd (we have put all 2´s together), hence:
\[n = {2^k} \cdot M\,,\,\,M\,\,{\text{odd}}\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,n\,\,{\text{has}}\,\,\,2\left[ {\left( {k + 1} \right) \cdot \left( {\# \,\,{\text{positive}}\,\,{\text{factors}}\,\,{\text{of}}\,\,M} \right)} \right]\,\,\,{\text{factors}}\]
\[2n = {2^{k + 1}} \cdot M\,,\,\,M\,\,{\text{odd}}\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,n\,\,{\text{has}}\,\,\,2\left[ {\left( {k + 1 + 1} \right) \cdot \left( {\# \,\,{\text{positive}}\,\,{\text{factors}}\,\,{\text{of}}\,\,M} \right)} \right]\,\,\,{\text{factors}}\]
Note that
\[2\left[ {\left( {k + 1 + 1} \right)} \right] \ne 2\left( {k + 1} \right)\]
guarantees that no positive even integer satisfies statement (2)... we are done.

Regards,
fskilnik.
Last edited by fskilnik@GMATH on Thu Sep 06, 2018 8:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Tue Sep 04, 2018 10:06 pm
vaibhav101 wrote:is the integer n odd?

1) n is divisible by 3.
2) 2n is divisible by twice as many integers as n.
Let's take each statement one by one.

1) n is divisible by 3.

n can be odd (say 3) or even (say 6). Insufficient.

2) 2n is divisible by twice as many integers as n.

Case 1: Say n is odd; take n = 3, thus 2n = 6

Factors of n = 3: {1, 2, 3};
Factors of 2n = 6: {1, 2, 3, 6}. Number of factors of 2n (there are 4 factors) is double the number of factors of n (there are 2 factors)

Thus, n can be odd.

Let's see whether n can be even.

Case 2: Say n is even; take n = 2, thus 2n = 4

Factors of n = 2: {1, 2,};
Factors of 2n = 4: {1, 2, 4}. Number of factors of 2n (there are 3 factors) is NOT double the number of factors of n (there are 2 factors).

Thus, n cannot be even.

Thus, the answer is, yes. Sufficient.

The correct answer: B

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review

Locations: Manhattan Review Visakhapatnam | GMAT Prep Warangal | GRE Prep Dilsukhnagar | Begumpet GRE Coaching | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion