BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolute Value!!!!

Expert replies

by hamxa » Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:50 am
Ian please explain in light of corrected statement B:

if y .= 0, what is the value of x ?

1. |x-3| >= y
2. |x-3| <= -y


please explain how it wraps to B only.
Join the discussion

by Thouraya » Tue May 31, 2011 7:29 am
@Ian or @Kevin, can you please explain in detail as I have been confused with the conversation above. This is the official question and the OA for this is B (Gmatprep):

If y>=0, what is the value of x?
1) absolute value x-3>=y
2)absoulte value x-3<=-y


The way I solve it: 1 is not sufficient as we have two unknowns, so there is no way we can come up with a value for x. Statement 2 is impossible, absolute values are always positive, so this could not possibly be less than or equal to -y. Is this why you say OA is E? Appreciated
Join the discussion

by krnverma » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:34 am
Hi Thouraya,
You are missing one value of y when you say that the second statement is not possible.
The question it self says y>=0. So, if y = 0 then for |x-3| to be equal to 0, x will have to be 3.

And the question asks us the value for x.

So statement 2 alone is sufficient.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by prateek_guy2004 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:55 pm
Well i am not convinced with B either It should be C.

statement 1 says |x-3|>=y
x>=y+3
Insufficient

Statement 2 says lx-3l is greater than or equal to -y

x>=-y+3

Insufficient

After concluding both statements +y and -y can be eliminated and x>=6

Hence C[spoiler][/spoiler]
Don't look for the incorrect things that you have done rather look for remedies....

https://www.beatthegmat.com/motivation-t90253.html
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:50 am
Can anyone provide a brief explanation to the problem ? It will be very helpful.
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by studentps2011 » Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:50 pm
Statement 1: doesn't give a definite value for x;
y can be any value equal to or greater than zero and correspondingly we can get different values for x.

Statement 2: y is equal to zero or a positive number, as per the question stem. Hence -y should be zero or a negative number.

|x-3| is given as less than or equal to -y
ie., |x-3| is equal to zero or a negative number.

Since modulus of a number or expression can never be negative, |x-3| has to be zero.

Therefore,
x-3=0
x=3
OR
-x+3=0,
again x=3. (Sufficient)
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:41 pm
In light of the revised question, as posted by "Hamxa", the explanations given by
Studentps2011" holds true.
Join the discussion