BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolute value concept

Expert replies
by abhirup1711 » Fri Apr 19, 2013 2:10 am
Is root x a prime number?

(1)|3x-7| = 2x+2

(2) x^2 = 9x

The answer is (c) and the solution comes out by considering x>= 7/3 and x <=7/3

On the other hand in another sum:

Is x > 0?

(1) |x + 3| = 4x - 3

(2) |x + 1| = 2x - 1

Where, the answer is (d) and the solution comes out by just considering RHS has to be +ve because LHS is absolute value.

May I ask an expert to please tell me when do I consider which of the two cases and solve a sum?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Anju@Gurome » Fri Apr 19, 2013 2:40 am
abhirup1711 wrote:May I ask an expert to please tell me when do I consider which of the two cases and solve a sum?
In the first case we need to know the exact value of x in order to determine whether its square root is prime or not. So, we need to solve the equation to pinpoint the possible values of x.

Whereas in the second case, we only need to determine whether x is positive or negative. So, we may not need to solve the equation.

But when to solve absolute value equation/inequalities and when not - ultimately it depends upon your practice and experience.
For example, in the second case, an experienced student will be able to identify that we actually do not need to solve the equation as
  • In statement 1, (4x - 3) ≥ 0 as it is equal to an absolute value.
    So, x ≥ 3/4 > 0 ---> x > 0

    In statement 2, (2x - 1) ≥ 0 as it is equal to an absolute value.
    So, x ≥ 1/2 > 0 ---> x > 0
But do not take this as the ultimate trick.
If the problem was as follows,
Is x > 0?

(1) |x + 3| = 4x - 3
(2) |x + 2| = 2x + 1
Then we can easily say statement 1 is sufficient as per our earlier analysis.

For statement 2, using the same trick, (2x + 1) ≥ 0
So, x ≥ -1/2

Now, one may conclude that as x is greater than or equal to -1/2, x can be either positive or negative and statement 2 is insufficient.
But that will be a wrong conclusion.

Here is why...
If we solve the inequality in this case as follows,
  • # If x ≥ -2 ---> |x + 2| = (2x + 1)
    So, (x + 2) = (2x + 1)
    --> x = 1

    # If x < -2 ---> |x + 2| = -(x + 2)
    So, -(x + 2) = (2x + 1)
    --> x = -1
    Now, -1 is not less than -2 as we initially assumed.

    Hence, our only possible solution is x = 1, i.e. x > 0
    So, statement 2 is also sufficient.
To sum it up, tricky methods are less time consuming and should be tried first, but there is no guarantee that a tricky method will always lead you to the correct answer. This is because tricky methods are often problem-specific, i.e. a tricky method which is applicable to problem A may not be applicable to problem B even if both A and B are on the same concept.

Solve more and more problems with different approaches and you will automatically learn when to use which method.

My general tip for solving absolute value problems will be : Before jumping in to solve the equation/inequality, think in terms of distance on the number line...
  • 1. Does it solve the problem? If yes, we are done.
    2. If no, solve the equation/inequality.
Hope that helps.
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §
Join the discussion

by abhirup1711 » Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:06 am
Thanks a lot Anju. Much appreciated.
Join the discussion