BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Abs: What is the value of 'y'?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Tue Nov 02, 2010 2:35 am
euro wrote:What is the value of 'y'?

(1) 3 |x^2 - 4| = y-2

(2) |3-y| = 11
Statemetn 1: 3*|x² - 4| = y - 2
Thus, (y - 2) ≥ 0 as |x² - 4| ≥ 0. So y ≥ 2

Not sufficient.

Statement 2: |3 - y| = 11
Implies,
  • (1) (3 - y) = 11 => y = -8 ; For (3 - y) > 0
    (2) (y - 3) = 11 => y = 14 ; For (3 - y) < 0
Not sufficient.

1 & 2 Together: y ≥ 2 and y = 14.

Sufficient.

The correct answer is C.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:16 am
Hey euro,

Love the question, and I hope I'm not stepping on Rahul's explanation by chiming in but I think this one is full of great strategic takeaways.

A) If it helps, deal with the easier-to-use statement first

Here, the first statement is a mess...an absolute value in a multivariable equation that includes a squared term...I'd probably leave this one alone first, but the second statement is a little more straightforward and can get you started.

B) When performing algebra with absolute values, treat each absolute value as 2 different equations

For statement 2, the expression can be read two ways:

3 - y = 11

or

3 - y = -11

If you just plan to solve it as two different equations you'll make the work much easier (as much as people try desperately to avoid doing multiple equations...there's really no other way). Solving for y we find that:

y = 14 or y = -8

C) When statements are clearly insufficient, ask "Why Are You Here?", and when E seems obvious try to find a way to get C, or at least get close

Returning to statement 1, it's completely useless on its own - with an x variable within the absolute value we can't possibly solve for y. And statement 2 does not solve for x, so we're still stuck with two variables. This is pretty easily not sufficient even with both together, right?

Strategically, know this - they don't give away E answers easily! The only way you should ever select E on a DS problem is when you can point to that "a-ha!" reason that it cannot be solved...you should be able to get one step away but recognize that there's one pesky unknown that just won't go away. Accordingly, before you quickly answer E, you have to get within striking distance of C, and the best way to do that is to try to find some synergy between the two statements.

In this case, why would they give you two variables in statement 1 with no hope of eliminating one in statement 2? The only logical reason is that statement 1 could still be helpful even without solving for x.

So let's investigate - statement 2 was pretty helpful in giving us exactly two options for y:

y is either -8 or it's 14

Can statement 1 eliminate one of those options?

We know that, at a minimum, an absolute value is equal to 0...it can never be negative. If we rephrase statement 1 to solve for y, we get:

y = 3 (|x^2 - 4|) + 2

So y is >= 2 - it cannot possibly be -8. Statement 1 is pretty useless on its own, but in concert with statement 2 it eliminates one of two choices, and therefore the answer is C.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Join the discussion