BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A zero-CO2 U.S. economy can be achieved within the next thir

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Dec 24, 2018 5:19 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

A zero-CO2 U.S. economy can be achieved within the next thirty to fifty years without the use of nuclear power. The U.S. renewable energy resource base is vast and practically untapped. Available wind energy resources in 12 Midwestern and Rocky Mountain states equal about 2.5 times the entire electricity production of the United States. Given that we can satisfy our electricity needs by harnessing only 40% of the wind energy resources in these 12 states, it is extremely likely that we will be able to do away with CO2.

Which of the following would be most useful to evaluate the above argument?

A. What is the amount of wind energy resources available in rest of the states in the United States?

B. Are there any other renewable energy resources such as solar power, which can be used?

C. With the use of current technologies, what proportion of electricity generated through wind energy can be stored for use at future times when wind may not be blowing?

D. Are there strong corporate lobbies which will strongly oppose any move to substitute non-renewable sources of energy?

E. What proportion of wind energy is available only at inaccessible areas?

OA E

Source: e-GMAT
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:27 am
The question main subject talks about the U.S achieving a zero CO2 economy in the next 30 to 50 years. Wind energy seems to be a viable source of alternative energy and that is extremely likely that the US will be able to do away with CO2.

OPTION A - INCORRECT
Well, we already know the amount of wind energy that is available. The question is how viable is the current wind energy that we have even discovered? Cab we use it? This option is irrelevant.

OPTION B - INCORRECT
We have not finished using wind energy. So, this option has nothing to do with the argument sine we already know that wind energy is enough to meet with our needs. Why look into the sun?

OPTION C - INCORRECT
This option looks popular but I disagree with it. We are talking about achieving zero CO2 economy in 30 years or so. What has current technology got to do with it? For example, iPhone5 will be an obsolete technology in 3 years time, not to talk of 30 years.

OPTION D - INCORRECT
Quite tricky. Not all lobbies are successful. Popular demand can throw lobbies into a tailspin. But we need to do the acid test. if we answer yes to the question, it looks as if we answer no. This makes no difference. Also, it doesn't make the argument stronger in any way. We still need to know if we can even use the wind.

OPTION E - CORRECT
There you go! If the proportion of the wind that is available in accessible area is very low (let say 5%), then that means 95% of the wind is available. This, hence, portray the correct answer.
Join the discussion