A significant drop in the number of accidents caused by impa

This topic has expert replies
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
Followed by:23 members

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

A significant drop in the number of accidents caused by impaired driving due to cell phone use is chiefly a result of aggressive public awareness efforts on the part of the government as well as the cell phone industry itself. A new marketing campaign by a major telecommunications firm emphasizes the ways in which a cell phone should and should not be used by drivers. However, some public safety experts are concerned that this will lead drivers to become overconfident in their ability to handle both tasks and will increase the number of accidents.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the objections that public safety experts have to the new marketing campaign?

(A) The number of people who use their cell phones while driving has decreased since the marketing campaign began.

(B) The marketing campaign is part of an effort to increase the sales of a new type of phone that was specifically designed to be used without drivers needing to look at or touch the phone at all.

(C) The drop in the number of accidents caused by impaired driving due to cell phone use is especially large among younger drivers.

(D) Studies conducted by public safety experts have shown that most people are not good judges of how well they can handle cell phone use while driving.

(E) Initial reports have shown that most people who have been exposed to the marketing campaign have modified their driving habits in beneficial ways.

OA E

Source: EMPOWERgmat

Legendary Member
Posts: 2214
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
Followed by:5 members

by deloitte247 » Wed Jul 31, 2019 5:12 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

To answer this question, we need to find what will oppose public safety experts concern.
Premise: A new marketing campaign by a major telecommunications firm emphasizes how a cell phone should and should not be used by drivers.

Option A - Incorrect
This is an already established fact in the argument. So, it doesn't weaken the experts claim.

Option B - Incorrect
If true, then it is in correlation with the new campaign that is about to be launched, which is the reason for the experts' objections.

Option C - Incorrect
We are not concerned about the age group of those involved in the reduction of accidents due to using a phone while driving.

Option D - Incorrect
This explains the reason why the experts' objection should be taken into consideration. It further strengthens their objections rather than weaken it.

Option E - Correct
This means that there is no need for the experts' objections due to the fact that people have modified their driving habits in beneficial ways.