Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

A researcher studying drug addicts found that

Expert replies
by akhpad » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:49 am
A researcher studying drug addicts found that, on average, they tend to manipulate other people a great deal more than nonaddicts do. The researcher concluded that people who frequently manipulate other people are likely to become addicts.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcher's conclusion?

A. After becoming addicted to drugs, drug addicts learn to manipulate other people as a way of obtaining drugs.

B. When they are imprisoned, drug addicts often use their ability to manipulate other people to obtain better living conditions.

C. Some nonaddicts manipulate other people more than some addicts do

D. People who are likely to become addicts exhibit unusual behavior patterns other than frequent manipulation of other people

E. The addicts that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful in obtaining what they wanted when they manipulated other people.

I could not understood why A is correct even I went through the answer.
Can someone explain in detail and in easy language?

What does manipulate indicate here? -> encouraging others to do same thing.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by magizhan » Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:20 am
Evidence: Drug addicts manipulate others than non addicts do

Conclusion: If a person manipulates others, he/she is likely to become an addict.

Assumption: A person before becoming a drug addict manipulates others.

A. clearly tells that only after becoming addicts they start to manipulate others thereby weakening the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by T11 » Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:22 am
Hi,
akhp77 wrote: I could not understood why A is correct even I went through the answer.
Can someone explain in detail and in easy language?

What does manipulate indicate here? -> encouraging others to do same thing.
You actually don't need to know what manipulate means here. Let's replace manipulate with say Trick. Now the stimulus states

1) The researcher found that:
Drug Addicts -> Trick (Manipulate) people more than nonaddicts

Based on this fact the researcher concludes that:
People who frequently trick (manipulate) other people -> are likely to become addicts

But, what if a person learns to trick people after he has become an addict. In other words, act of tricking people is the result of (follows) drug addiction.

If this were true, the researchers conclusion (people who trick are likely to become addicts i.e. drug addiction is the result of (follows) tricking people would be weakened and this is what choice A states.

Hope this helps.

T11
Join the discussion

by Anshul Kapoor » Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:33 am
I got the choices between, A & D; although I understood A, but what I do not understand is that why answer choice 'D' is wrong? According to D, anyhow the likely to be addict does not manipulate others, so this could be correct too. OR, is it wrong because of the word 'frequent' ?

Cheers
A
Join the discussion

by metallicafan » Wed Apr 25, 2012 9:37 pm
+1 A

D is out of scope.
Join the discussion

by heymayank08 » Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:43 pm
A the best choice
Join the discussion

by holidevil » Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:19 pm
Why is the answer not D? In the given case, the author concludes that manipulative behavior causes people to become addicts. Thus, A causes B. The CR bible says that if we can show that there are other factors at play that cause B, and A is not the only one, then it undermines or weakens the argument. The choice D tells us that manipulative behavior is the not the sole reason for people becoming addict, i.e. A alone is not responsible for the cause of B. Can't we take such a reasoning to say that D indeed is the correct choice?
Help appreciated.
Join the discussion

by vk_vinayak » Tue May 01, 2012 1:47 am
Why not D?

Conclusion: -> Manipulative people are likely to become drug addicts.

D. People who are likely to become addicts exhibit unusual behavior patterns other than frequent manipulation of other people.

So, it says that the people who are likely to become drug addicts have the manipulative behavior. ie people with manipulative behavior (and other patterns) become drug addicts. It doesn't rule out that manipulative people become drug addicts.

A, which says that people learn manipulating after becoming drug addicts, is clearly weakens the argument.
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
Join the discussion