Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

A question that's been bothering me

Expert replies
by Buix0065 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:52 pm
I've just started studying, using Kaplan GMAT premier...

Q: A recently published article on human physiology claims that enzyme K contributes to improved performance in strenuous activities such as weightlifting and sprinting. The article cites evidence of above-average levels of enzyme K in Olympic weightlifters and sprinters.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the article's conclusion?

A. Enzyme K levels are the most important factor affecting the performance of strenuous activities.
B. Enzyme K has no other function in the human body.
C. Enzyme K is required for the performance of strenuous activities.
D. Enzyme K helps weightlifters more than it helps sprinters.
E. Strenuous activities do not cause the human body to produce unusually high levels of enzyme K.

Answer: E[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by fitzgerald23 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:27 pm
Whats the conclusion?

Enzyme K contributes to improved performance in strenuous activities

Why?

Because above average levels of K are in weightlifters and sprinters

The question is asking for evidence as you how to make the reasoning stronger

A. Incorrect. They never state that its the most important, just that its a contributing factor. There could be plenty of other more important factors

B. Incorrect. Whether or not it has no other function is irrelevant to contributing to performance

C. Incorrect. Again its a contributing factor. Its not required. It just may make you perform better

D. Incorrect. Completely irrelevant. Who it helps more is unimportant.

E. Correct. The conclusion states that enzyme K leads to improved performance. If strenuous activities cause the increased levels of K then the conclusion would be invalid. In that case the evidence would state that strenuous activity forces the body to create more enzyme K. By knowing that strenuous activity does not create more enzyme we are strengthening the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by Buix0065 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:46 pm
fitzgerald23 wrote:Whats the conclusion?

Enzyme K contributes to improved performance in strenuous activities

Why?

Because above average levels of K are in weightlifters and sprinters

The question is asking for evidence as you how to make the reasoning stronger

A. Incorrect. They never state that its the most important, just that its a contributing factor. There could be plenty of other more important factors

B. Incorrect. Whether or not it has no other function is irrelevant to contributing to performance

C. Incorrect. Again its a contributing factor. Its not required. It just may make you perform better

D. Incorrect. Completely irrelevant. Who it helps more is unimportant.

E. Correct. The conclusion states that enzyme K leads to improved performance. If strenuous activities cause the increased levels of K then the conclusion would be invalid. In that case the evidence would state that strenuous activity forces the body to create more enzyme K. By knowing that strenuous activity does not create more enzyme we are strengthening the conclusion.
Got it--thanks for the response, your reasoning for answer 'A' makes sense as to why it's incorrect. I think initially in my head I had the conclusion as "increased levels of enzyme K improved performance...."
Join the discussion