BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A question from princeton review

Expert replies
by ferndinho » Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:29 am
I am just beginning my GMAT prep (2nd time) and came across a problem in the princeton review cracking the GMAT book...it is on page 70...


The output of a factory was increased by 10% to keep up with rising demand. To handle the holiday rush, this new output was increased by 20%. By approximately what % would the output now have to be decreased in order to restore the original output?
a)20%
b)24%
c)30%
d)32%
e)70%


They list B 24% as the answer...I see no other answer than D32%. Am I completely missing something or is this a book mistake?

Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Hovey25 » Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:50 am
You probably have a slight error in your calculation...

My guess is you took a number lets say 1000

10% increase 1000*1.1=1100 additional 20% increase 1100*1.2=1320

Here is your mistake 1320-1000=320...320/1000=32%

You need to take the decrease from the output after the 10 and 20% increases, not the original output

So...1320-1000=320...320/1320=24.24% round to 24%
Join the discussion