BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A March 2000 Census

Expert replies
by atulmangal » Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:19 pm
A March 2000 Census Bureau survey showed that Mexico accounted for more than a quarter of all foreign-born residents of the United States, the largest share for any country to contribute since 1890, when about 30 percent of the country's foreign-born population was from Germany.

A. the largest share for any country to contribute
B. the largest share that any country has contributed
C. which makes it the largest share for any country to contribute
D. having the largest share to be contributed by any country
E. having the largest share to have been contributed by any country

[spoiler]Discuss b/w Op A and B[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by HSPA » Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:25 pm
B because of since 1890..
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by rohu27 » Tue Apr 12, 2011 10:05 pm
as since is used makes sense to use present perfect.
Since 1980, no country has contributed X apart from Mexico.

also when you look at the meaning of option A it says the largest share for any country to contribute, it means as if there was some stipulated share into which the countries contribute and this had been the largest one. -> this is how i understood the first tiem i read the sentence.
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Tue Apr 12, 2011 10:35 pm
rohu27 wrote:as since is used makes sense to use present perfect.
Since 1980, no country has contributed X apart from Mexico.

also when you look at the meaning of option A it says the largest share for any country to contribute, it means as if there was some stipulated share into which the countries contribute and this had been the largest one. -> this is how i understood the first tiem i read the sentence.
@rohu

I understand your thought and thats the same thing i thought when i solved this question...also its a tried and tested trick.."since" indicate the use of present perfect and in all the question i solved before this one i find this trick successful...

But the OA given is Op A not Op B, thats why m bit confused and post this question...any idea???
Join the discussion

by champmag » Tue Apr 12, 2011 10:36 pm
+1 for B as has contribured since 1980 is correct grammatical construction.
Join the discussion

by rohu27 » Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:21 pm
whts the source atul? i gogoled for correst answer and this is wht i found:

https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/dou ... t8489.html the poster says the answer is B.

apart from tht read ron's comment:
actually, the only acceptable tense for a clause modified by "since..." is the present perfect.

be careful! note that this is for the clause being modified by "since...", NOT for the words following "since".
now wht does the second sentence meah here,"not for words following since"?
confused.
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:34 pm
@rohu

source is some trusted question bank and as indicated in the manhattan forum its probably from pinceton reviw...even i googled and found the same thing and nowhere the any expert said that Op B is correct or indicate that Op A is wrong...so m confused and thought would get some help in this forum...about that Ron's post, even i didn't get what that mean...even for the clause followed by SINCE...i apply present perfect and that works...lets see if someone come up with an explanation otherwise will call some expert...
Join the discussion

by force5 » Wed Apr 13, 2011 10:27 am
You are correct bro. The answer is B. we need present perfect tense. First let me answer your question regarding Ron's post.

We MOSTLY use present perfect tense with "Since". We use this tense when the clause is question is being modified by since (In the beginning of sentence or at the end). However the next clause need not be using perfect tense....

as you see in this sentence. the second part uses a simple past tense.
when about 30 percent of the country's foreign-born population was from Germany
SECONDLY....

I really feel happy to see everyone helping each other on the forum. But i really feel that faculty is more prompt in Quant. I don't think the forum takes Verbal too seriously. As i said earlier we are all here to learn and can't teach each other everything or beyond a point. The posts need to be checked by Faculty and they need to approve and make corrections.
I really enjoy being here but i would want to request the faculty to be equally responsive for verbal too.
Guys please let me know if i need to send my request to someone special on this forum???

Besides this great going guys!!
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Wed Apr 13, 2011 11:29 am
force5 wrote:You are correct bro. The answer is B. we need present perfect tense. First let me answer your question regarding Ron's post.

We MOSTLY use present perfect tense with "Since". We use this tense when the clause is question is being modified by since (In the beginning of sentence or at the end). However the next clause need not be using perfect tense....

as you see in this sentence. the second part uses a simple past tense.
when about 30 percent of the country's foreign-born population was from Germany
SECONDLY....

I really feel happy to see everyone helping each other on the forum. But i really feel that faculty is more prompt in Quant. I don't think the forum takes Verbal too seriously. As i said earlier we are all here to learn and can't teach each other everything or beyond a point. The posts need to be checked by Faculty and they need to approve and make corrections.
I really enjoy being here but i would want to request the faculty to be equally responsive for verbal too.
Guys please let me know if i need to send my request to someone special on this forum???

Besides this great going guys!!
@force

I actually send a mail to an expert not associated with this forum, i didn't get his reply in detail....but i share what i got???

He said

'has contributed will mean till now... ' the correct answer is definitely A. We are talking about March 2000.

if you make our some sense in this..i get some glimpse but not 100% sure or should we call some expert???
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1