A Manhattan SC problem

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 3:53 am

A Manhattan SC problem

by edwardc » Sat Jan 25, 2014 4:14 am
For all her asserted scorn of such books, Jeanette had a bookcase full of romance
novels.
(A) For all her asserted scorn of such books,
(B) Having always asserted scorn for such books,
(C) All such books were, she asserted, scorned, and
(D) Asserting that all such books were scorned,
(E) In spite of assertions of scorning all such activities,

OA is A. Are B and D better than A? The second part of the sentence started with 'Jeanette'.

Please advise. Many Thanks.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Sat Jan 25, 2014 6:36 pm
Hi edwardc,

This SC is based on modification rules. Here we have an opening phrase followed by a comma; that phrase is descriptive and modifies that noun that comes next (in this case, "Jeanette"). The correct answer has to use the proper grammar to describe/modify a person.

Answer A does describe a person (notice the use of the pronoun "her").
Answer B could describe a person, but might not (perhaps it describes a company or a group).
Answer D could describe a person, but might not (same problem as answer B).

In an SC, vague language isn't considered correct. Here, the modifier has to perfectly match the modified word (and vice-versa).

Final Answer: A

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 3:53 am

by edwardc » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:01 am
Rich, Sorry for the late reply. Thank you so much for the explanation!

Ed

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:55 am
edwardc wrote:For all her asserted scorn of such books, Jeanette had a bookcase full of romance
novels.
(A) For all her asserted scorn of such books,
(B) Having always asserted scorn for such books,
(C) All such books were, she asserted, scorned, and
(D) Asserting that all such books were scorned,
(E) In spite of assertions of scorning all such activities,

OA is A. Are B and D better than A? The second part of the sentence started with 'Jeanette'.

Please advise. Many Thanks.
Pay attention to MEANING as well as grammar.
The phrase for all means in spite of.
Thus, the intention of the original sentence is to express a CONTRAST:
IN SPITE OF her asserted scorn of such books, Jeanette had a bookcase full of romance
novels.

B and D do not express the required contrast.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 7:01 am

by shubham12123 » Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:37 pm
Why E is incorrect ?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Jun 04, 2016 2:20 am
shubham12123 wrote:Why E is incorrect ?
One reason:
It is unclear what is meant by all such ACTIVITIES.
The intended meaning of the original sentence is that Jeannette claims to be scornful of a particular type of BOOK.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3