Hey Vinni,
You're right that he gets there three hours late. However, the method described by Hemant is setting that "three hours later" as right on time. Then, he is calculating what the time would be for "four hours early" from that new benchmark.
If you really wanted to, you could set the original time as t+3 (three hours late), then solve back to t-1 (four hours earlier). It won't actually make any difference, because the four hour difference is the same whether it's t and t+4 or t-1 and t+3.
Does that make more sense?
-t
P.S. I want to second Ron's annoyance with the wording of the question. People post a TON of questions on here that do not simulate the real test. If you ever read a single grammatical error in a question, odds are good it comes from a dangerous source. For example, in this case it says "A man traveling at x speed will reach 3 hours late." A grammatically correct sentence would say "A man traveling at x miles per hour will reach his destination three hours late." A grammatically correct version of the whole question might say:
A man travels from City X to City Y, which is d miles away from City X. He travels in a straight line, and arrives in City Y three hours later than he intended. If the trip took t hours, at what speed should he have travelled if he'd wanted to leave at the same time but arrive an hour earlier than he intended?
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT
If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
