BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

a good cr!

Expert replies
by gmat_perfect » Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:03 pm
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In some countries it is not illegal for a company to drive away competitors by selling a product below cost.
(B) Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge.
(C) As part of promotions designed to attract new customers, airlines sometimes reduce their ticket prices to below an economically sustainable level.
(D) On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations.
(E) When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.

[spoiler]OA: b[/spoiler]


why not e?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by kvcpk » Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:15 pm
Conclusion of argument is that the attempt of airline companies will not be beneficial in the long run because it provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares

We need to weaken this conclusion.

B says that the airline company will not reduce the prices again and again when new competitiros arrive.
This will weaken the conclusion because, it shows that the airline companies will not be affected much.

E says:
When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.

We can only understand from this that the number of passengers grew. We do not know if the increase in passengers is resulting in increasing profits??

Let us say, there are 10 seats avaialble.
Price = 200$
Number of passengers = 5
Revenue = 1000$

Let Price be reduced to 100$
Number of passengers inceased to 9
Revenue = 900$
Less than what it was earlier.
In this case it will support the conclusion.
Hence we cant choose E.

Hope this helps!!
Join the discussion

by indiantiger » Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:29 pm
The conclusion is that if lower your products prices to scare away the competition then you cannot bring the prices up w/o opening the gates for competition. We need an answer choice that breaks this conclusion

(A) In some countries it is not illegal for a company to drive away competitors by selling a product below cost. <does not make any sense>
(B) Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge.
(C) As part of promotions designed to attract new customers, airlines sometimes reduce their ticket prices to below an economically sustainable level. <good to know but how does it help us in answering the question>
(D) On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations. <I think what the question maker is trying is to trick you by thinking that if airlines are going to put their operations somewhere else they wont move back to the route they left >
(E) When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly. <this is actually kind of strength the conclusion, an airline can only serve x number of passengers due to limited seats so the overhead of extra travelers would be an invitation for other airlines to come in fill that gap.>
"Single Malt is better than Blended"
Join the discussion