SC as / which /is /indicate/indicated

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

SC as / which /is /indicate/indicated

by mundasingh123 » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:13 am
The early inhabitants of the Nile Valley used primitive forked sticks and wooden hoes to sow barley, millet, and summer wheat successfully, which archaeology indicates that they did.

A)which archaeology indicates that they did
B)which they did, according to archaeology
C)as archaeological findings indicate that they did
D)as is indicated by archaeology
E)as is archaeologically found to be the case
EDIT Could someone explain the SC with proper grammatical explanations
Last edited by mundasingh123 on Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

by aspirant2011 » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:22 am
The early inhabitants of the Nile Valley used primitive forked sticks and wooden hoes to sow barley, millet, and summer wheat successfully, which archaeology indicates that they did.

A)which archaeology indicates that they did -----> somehow not convinced for the referent of which
B)which they did, according to archaeology -----> same as A
C)as archaeological findings indicate that they did
D)as is indicated by archaeology -----> i think it changes the meaning
E)as is archaeologically found to be the case ------> awkward

whats the OA??????

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:33 am
aspirant2011 wrote:The early inhabitants of the Nile Valley used primitive forked sticks and wooden hoes to sow barley, millet, and summer wheat successfully, which archaeology indicates that they did.

A)which archaeology indicates that they did -----> somehow not convinced for the referent of which
B)which they did, according to archaeology -----> same as A
C)as archaeological findings indicate that they did
D)as is indicated by archaeology -----> i think it changes the meaning
E)as is archaeologically found to be the case ------> awkward

whats the OA??????
How does D change the meaning ?
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

by aspirant2011 » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:39 am
mundasingh123 wrote:
aspirant2011 wrote:The early inhabitants of the Nile Valley used primitive forked sticks and wooden hoes to sow barley, millet, and summer wheat successfully, which archaeology indicates that they did.

A)which archaeology indicates that they did -----> somehow not convinced for the referent of which
B)which they did, according to archaeology -----> same as A
C)as archaeological findings indicate that they did
D)as is indicated by archaeology -----> i think it changes the meaning
E)as is archaeologically found to be the case ------> awkward

whats the OA??????
How does D change the meaning ?
archaelogy can't indicate anything by itself, its only the findings which can indicate the things........

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:41 am
How do we eliminate E ?
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

by aspirant2011 » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:48 am
mundasingh123 wrote:How do we eliminate E ?
E is really awkward construction i.e meaningless as it says "as is archaelogically found to be the case".......as is used for comparing clauses and I don't feel so in E the comparison is proper,moreover, E feels as if the case is true every where

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:52 am
aspirant2011 wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:How do we eliminate E ?
E is really awkward construction i.e meaningless as it says "as is archaelogically found to be the case".......as is used for comparing clauses and I don't feel so in E the comparison is proper,moreover, E feels as if the case is true every where
No, As is not always used for comparing clauses
also E has a clause after as
i do understand to some extent what u mean by saying that E seems to be stating a universal truth . However i need further clarification . Nevertheless, u hit the OA
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

by aspirant2011 » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:54 am
mundasingh123 wrote:
aspirant2011 wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:How do we eliminate E ?
E is really awkward construction i.e meaningless as it says "as is archaelogically found to be the case".......as is used for comparing clauses and I don't feel so in E the comparison is proper,moreover, E feels as if the case is true every where
No, As is not always used for comparing clauses
also E has a clause after as
but I am not finding the meaning clear in E and thats the reason of me rejecting the same.....

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:57 am
mundasingh123 wrote:How do we eliminate E ?
Hi,
E is awkward as well as passive construction.
Last edited by Frankenstein on Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:58 am
aspirant2011 wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:
aspirant2011 wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:How do we eliminate E ?
E is really awkward construction i.e meaningless as it says "as is archaelogically found to be the case".......as is used for comparing clauses and I don't feel so in E the comparison is proper,moreover, E feels as if the case is true every where
No, As is not always used for comparing clauses
also E has a clause after as
but I am not finding the meaning clear in E and thats the reason of me rejecting the same.....
ok , just as a sidenotes its my rejecting the same
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 9:09 am
Location: pune
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:3 members

by amit2k9 » Thu Jun 30, 2011 9:49 pm
causation usage of as here.
I will not tell you, as you already know. (example)

As has been used as a preposition thereby requiring a Noun or a noun phrase.
E archaeologically is an adjective.Hence POE.

C archaeology a noun. Hence Correct usage.Thus C it is.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:50 pm
Frankenstein wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:How do we eliminate E ?
Hi,
E is awkward as well as passive construction.
Awkward construction is just an excuse used to remove options just the way out of scope is an excuse for removing options in CR . Passive constructions arent always unacceptable on GMAT
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:54 pm
mundasingh123 wrote:
Frankenstein wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:How do we eliminate E ?
Hi,
E is awkward as well as passive construction.
Awkward construction is just an excuse used to remove options just the way out of scope is an excuse for removing options in CR . Passive constructions arent always unacceptable on GMAT
It is not an excuse, it is preference of the better. It is not absolute but relative. If we find a better construct than awkward, we eliminate awkward. If we find passive construct when active already conveys the same meaning in another option, we eliminate the passive one.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:59 pm
Frankenstein wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:
Frankenstein wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:How do we eliminate E ?
Hi,
E is awkward as well as passive construction.
Awkward construction is just an excuse used to remove options just the way out of scope is an excuse for removing options in CR . Passive constructions arent always unacceptable on GMAT
It is not an excuse, it is preference of the better. It is not absolute but relative. If we find a better construct than awkward, we eliminate awkward. If we find passive construct when active already conveys the same meaning in another option, we eliminate the passive one.
So in this case we are not sure whether awkwardness/passiveness is the only thing wrong with E or not .
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:02 pm
mundasingh123 wrote:So in this case we are not sure whether awkwardness/passiveness is the only thing wrong with E or not .
Yup...At least we are not sure of the grammatical errors in E. May be experts can help on this.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

• Page 1 of 1