A car insurance company is considering issuing a new policy

This topic has expert replies
Moderator
Posts: 426
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 8:48 pm
Followed by:1 members
A car insurance company is considering issuing a new policy to cover damages caused by elderly drivers. The company needs to keep premiums low to attract customers, but this might cause the company to lose money as it may mean that the income generated by the premiums will not be sufficient to cover the damages caused by older drivers."¨"¨Which of the following strategies will most likely lower the company's worries?

A. Insuring drivers that are at a younger age and are unlikely to submit claims for several years
B. Insuring only people with a solid driving background and no previous accidents
C. Insuring drivers with sufficient income to cover the damages
D. Insuring only drivers rejected by other companies' policies
E. Including more categories of damages in the policy than in most older-driver policies

Any approach to determine the best answer?

Legendary Member
Posts: 2898
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:49 pm
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:5 members

by Vincen » Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:05 am
I think B is the most logical option. Experts, could you please help us here.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 6:10 am
Followed by:3 members

by VJesus12 » Tue Oct 24, 2017 3:16 pm
Hello ardz24 and Vincen.

I think the right option should be option C.

This is logically related to the argument above.

But, I would like an expert could help us here.