BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A 20 percent decline in lobster catches

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorRO » Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:15 am
A 20 percent decline in lobster catches in Maine waters since 1980 can be justifiably blamed on legislation passed in 1972 to protect harbor seals. Maine's population of harbor seals is now double the level existing before production was initiated, and these seals are known to eat both fish and lobsters.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?

(A) Harbor seals usually eat more fish than lobsters, but the seals are natural predators of both.

(B) Although harbor seals are skillful predators of lobsters, they rarely finish eating their catch.

(C) Harbor seals attract tourists to Maine's coastal areas, thus revitalizing the local economy.

(D) Authors of the 1972 legislation protecting harbor seals were convinced that an increase in that animal's numbers would not have a measurably negative impact on the lobster catch.

(E) The record lobster harvests of the late 1970's removed large numbers of mature lobsters from the reproductive stock.

OA is E

What makes the OA the best pick here. I need an explanation on it. An Expert analysis. Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Tue Aug 14, 2018 4:13 am
Option A - INCORRECT.
This option is in support of why there is an incredible increase in Maine's population of harbor seals and a decrease in Lobsters catch. Harbor seals usually eat more fish than lobsters, but the seals are natural predators of both, and lobsters are more easily accessible for harbor seals to dine on.

Option B - INCORRECT.
Harbor seals are skillful predators of lobsters, they rarely finish eating their catch but lobsters remnants are not useful to human lobster hunters/fisherman.

Option C - INCORRECT.
This option is one of the main reasons why legislation passed the law in 1972 to protect harbor seals from being hunted. Harbor seals attract tourists to Maine's coastal areas, thus revitalizing the local economy.

Option D - INCORRECT.
This is also one of the reasons behind the increase in harbor seals and decrease in lobster catch. Authors of the 1972 legislation protecting harbor seals were convinced that an increase in that animal's numbers would not have a measurably negative impact on the lobster catch.

Option E - CORRECT.
This option has seriously weaken the argument. Assuming the record lobster harvests of the late 1970's removed large numbers of mature lobsters from the reproductive stock, the young lobsters then by now would have matured and duly reproduced more than enough for the harvesters. But, due to the legislation passed in 1972 to protect harbor seals, the increasing numbers of the harbor seals has eaten and decreased the number of lobster catch in the maines water.
Join the discussion