BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

8 teams in conference

Expert replies
by mberkowitz » Fri Sep 26, 2008 2:49 pm
there are 8 teams in a conference. how many games are possible if each team plays eachother twice?

OA 56

if each team played the other only once, the answer would be 8c2 or 28. in this case, bc they play eachother twice, the total number of games will be 28 times 2 or 56.

can somebody please explain the theory behind this counting method? i understand the ratoinal behind the factorial in this case, but have trouble distiguishing between cases in which team only play once, twice, and how to avoid counting a v b and b v a as seperate games...

thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Morgoth » Fri Sep 26, 2008 3:00 pm
A B C D E F G H

Games played

AB AC AD AE AF AG AH----7 GAMES
BC BD BE BF BG BH--------6 GAMES
CD CE CF CG CH-----------5 GAMES
DE DF DG DH----------------4 GAMES
EF EG EH---------------------3 GAMES
FG FH-------------------------2 GAMES
GH-----------------------------1 GAME

1+2+3+4+5+6+7 = 28 GAMES

Each team plays with the other twice

28*2 = 56 Games

Hope its clear.
Join the discussion

by mberkowitz » Fri Sep 26, 2008 3:05 pm
appreciate that, i guess the best method to learn these ones is to picture it like that, i just have trouble going from there to the factorial. i.e. thats a great method if you have 4 mins, but clearly not the fastest option.
Join the discussion

by Morgoth » Fri Sep 26, 2008 3:17 pm
mberkowitz wrote:appreciate that, i guess the best method to learn these ones is to picture it like that, i just have trouble going from there to the factorial. i.e. thats a great method if you have 4 mins, but clearly not the fastest option.
I thought you were looking for clarity rather than which method to follow.

If you are looking for the method its hard to beat 8C2, which is the most effective on such type of questions.
Join the discussion

by mberkowitz » Fri Sep 26, 2008 4:05 pm
i was looking for an explanation of the method in this problem. in other words this problem stumped me even though i know the method and can usually execute it well, as i find the method arbitrary at times.

thanks for the help.
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Sat Sep 27, 2008 3:24 am
8c2 is clear
when a person is playing once with everyother

so 2 * 8c2 means each person played twice.

Perhaps I could not understand your problem well.....
please help me understanding your doubt.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by mberkowitz » Sat Sep 27, 2008 4:31 am
i was having trouble getting 8c2 quickly bc i was tending to worry about counting teams more than once (counting a v b and b v a as two seperate games). id imagine learning that property as is is the best way for me to proceed. thanks.
Join the discussion