Cynics charge

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:10 pm
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:2 members

Cynics charge

by satishchandra » Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:52 am
Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for stadiums with fewer seats to
reduce supply and increase ticket prices
.
A. lobbied for stadiums with fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
B. lobbied for stadiums with less seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
C. lobbied for stadiums that had fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
D. lobbied for stadiums that had less seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
E. lobbied for stadiums that had less seats as a means of reducing supply so they could
increase ticket prices.
[spoiler]OA: A; I thought 'C' was good.
What makes 'A' better than 'C'? [/spoiler]
This question has been posted many times but not many expects have looked at it
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:42 am
Thanked: 1 times

by mad2011 » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:46 am
satishchandra wrote:Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for stadiums with fewer seats to
reduce supply and increase ticket prices
.
A. lobbied for stadiums with fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
B. lobbied for stadiums with less seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
C. lobbied for stadiums that had fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
D. lobbied for stadiums that had less seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
E. lobbied for stadiums that had less seats as a means of reducing supply so they could
increase ticket prices.
[spoiler]OA: A; I thought 'C' was good.
What makes 'A' better than 'C'? [/spoiler]
This question has been posted many times but not many expects have looked at it


IMO A is correct, In C tense is not correct.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 11:07 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:14 members
GMAT Score:750

by CappyAA » Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:28 am
Yeah, I think satishchandra is right - A is correct because the tense is off in C.

Saying "...that had fewer seats..." changes the meaning a little. It implies that there were fewer seats at these stadiums in the past, but there may no longer be fewer seats at them. A doesn't change the meaning of the sentence.
Taking the GMAT Again...PhD this time!

October 2008 Score: GMAT - 750 (50 Q, 41 V) :D

Manhattan GMAT 1 - 11/20/11 - 750 (50 Q, 42 V)
Manhattan GMAT 2 - 12/3/11 - 780 (51 Q, 45 V)

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:55 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by bpdulog » Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:14 am
Less is not appropriate since you can count the number of seats, so that kills B D and E.

C changes the meaning. It implies the MLB was lobbying for stadiums that already had fewer seats, when in fact they were lobbying for stadiums to contain fewer seats going forward.
NO EXCUSES

"Winston tastes good like a cigarette should."

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:20 am
satishchandra wrote:Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for stadiums with fewer seats to
reduce supply and increase ticket prices
.
A. lobbied for stadiums with fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
B. lobbied for stadiums with less seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
C. lobbied for stadiums that had fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
D. lobbied for stadiums that had less seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
E. lobbied for stadiums that had less seats as a means of reducing supply so they could
increase ticket prices.
[spoiler]OA: A; I thought 'C' was good.
What makes 'A' better than 'C'? [/spoiler]
This question has been posted many times but not many expects have looked at it
In B, D and E, less cannot be used to refer to seats. Since the number of seats can be counted, the appropriate modifier is fewer. Eliminate B, D and E.

C changes the intended meaning: it implies that the stadiums already HAD fewer seats when Major League Baseball LOBBIED. Why would the league lobby for something that already existed? Eliminate C.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:10 pm
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:2 members

by satishchandra » Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:33 am
Not so convinced yet. :(
Can somebody explain how the meaning would change probably by giving some examples.
Had it been given as "lobbied for stadiums that have fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices", would it have been right option to pick?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:50 am
satishchandra wrote:Not so convinced yet. :(
Can somebody explain how the meaning would change probably by giving some examples.
Had it been given as "lobbied for stadiums that have fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices", would it have been right option to pick?
The league WANTED stadiums with fewer seats; thus, in saying that the stadiums already HAD fewer seats, C does not convey the intended meaning.

The following would convey the proper sequence of events: the league lobbied for stadiums that WOULD HAVE fewer seats.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

• Page 1 of 1