BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

690 to 710 ... but Q46 -> Q42 (also V39 -> V45)

Find out how Beat The GMAT members tackled GMAT test prep with positive results. Get tips on GMAT test prep materials, online courses, study tips, and more.
Expert replies
by AgadorShummy » Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:23 am
Hi All: Last night I received a 710 on my second GMAT round (received 690 in May):

- Quant: 42 (57%ile) vs. 46 (73%ile) in May
- Verbal: 45 (99%ile) vs. 39 (87%ile) in May

So while I'm elated about Verbal, I'm taken aback by my poor Quant performance this time around.

Question: How will schools see this? Will they disregard it and decide that my Q46 is "sufficient"? I know Tuck (and perhaps others) will take the highest pieces and combine them, so I presume the Verbal bump bodes well for me should I apply there. But for all other schools, what does my situation portend?

FYI: Some schools I'm looking at: Cornell, UNC, Duke, USC, Kelley, UT, Michigan, Georgetown... and (dreaming) Tuck, Booth, Kellogg, UCLA, NYU

Thanks in advance!
Join the discussion
Source: — I just Beat The GMAT! |

by Bschool2013 » Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:30 am
Tough situation. One thing that would make it easier to use the higher overall score is if the rest of your profile demonstrates strong quantative ability. That could put admissions at ease about the 42Q.

20 points is not alot, other than the psychological satisfaction of crossing the 700 barrier. Your 690 score is a lot closer to the 80%/80% balance, and I would think having a 73% vs. 57% in quant is more favorable than 99%ile over 87% in verbal.
Join the discussion

by naughtyboy » Fri Jul 20, 2012 11:00 am
Hi AgadorShummy,
Can you throw some light on how you increased the Verbal score from 39 to 45 in a couple of months.
That would be really helpful.
Join the discussion

by AgadorShummy » Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:27 pm
Hi - honestly, taking the LSAT three times kicked my @$$ and probably prepared me for the GMAT verbal section (excepting SC). In full disclosure, I hardly studied for the GMAT reading comp or critical reasoning, as I felt pretty prepared for it having gone through the LSAT ringer. It seems to me that harder GMAT c.r. problems are equivalent to easier LSAT "logical" reasoning questions. That said, I'd probably warn against diving into LSAT material in full, as the scope of reasoning q's there is wider than for the GMAT.

At any rate, I really think sentence-correction practice helped me improve. Go through as many as you can. My gut says that understanding parallelism, in particular, is helpful.

Not sure if this helps. Feel free to message me if I can give you more info. Clearly I'm more a "poet" than a quant :-) If only b-schools valued those people more than it appears they do...!
Join the discussion

by AgadorShummy » Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:29 pm
Also, can I ask where you stood on your last GMAT exam (or practice exam)?
Join the discussion

by AbhiJ » Sun Jul 22, 2012 9:55 am
AgadorShummy wrote:Hi - honestly, taking the LSAT three times kicked my @$$ and probably prepared me for the GMAT verbal section (excepting SC). In full disclosure, I hardly studied for the GMAT reading comp or critical reasoning, as I felt pretty prepared for it having gone through the LSAT ringer. It seems to me that harder GMAT c.r. problems are equivalent to easier LSAT "logical" reasoning questions. That said, I'd probably warn against diving into LSAT material in full, as the scope of reasoning q's there is wider than for the GMAT.

At any rate, I really think sentence-correction practice helped me improve. Go through as many as you can. My gut says that understanding parallelism, in particular, is helpful.

Not sure if this helps. Feel free to message me if I can give you more info. Clearly I'm more a "poet" than a quant :-) If only b-schools valued those people more than it appears they do...!
How would you advice using LSAT material for GMAT Prep ? Will practicing LSAT RC passages help ? Should we only practice LSAT CR Questions that are common to GMAT -strengthen, weaken assumption ?
Join the discussion

by AgadorShummy » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:36 am
That's a great question. I honestly am not the best person to ask about reading comp, as I really didn't follow any framework, despite my great course (Manhattan GMAT) teaching me to do so: I just couldn't grasp it. I think the RC stuff just takes practice. What's nice about LSAT RC passages is they're generally tough, dense, complex (unless you care about, like, abnormal reproductive habits of some test-tube strain of fruit flies). And don't get caught up in all the technical jargon when you read those RC passages!! Just try to get the drift of what they're saying. By conveying the boring, jargon-y details, GMAT folks are, I'm guessing, trying to throw you off. Better, probably, to understand the tone with which they convey those details. Is it part of a hypothesis they attempt to justify? Does it serve as an example, or counter-example, to the theory presented earlier in the passage? Clearly some questions will ask you to reference a particular detail, but I generally tried not to get wrapped up in the jargon until that time.

Phew. Long answer for RC. Regarding reasoning, yeah, I honestly could not tell you what type of reasoning questions were on the GMAT: I just sorta preserved my LSAT preparation and ran with it. If you can identify particular types of GMAT reasoning q's, then yes, by all means check out specific LSAT material. Probably best, too, not to get caught up with all the crazy additional LSAT question types, especially if you have a certain question type upon which you seek to improve.

Message me w/ any other q's -- this site (and others) helped prepare me and I'd love to return the favor.
Join the discussion