Neo2000 wrote:
You can therefore say that if X^3 = 16Y then Y = 4 and X = 4 since 16 = 4^2 and you need another 4 to satisfy the given equation.
You can't be sure that Y is 4 and that X is 4, which is what the above seems to imply. They certainly *could* have those values, but there are infinitely many other possibilities. For example, X could be 12 = (2^2)*3, and Y could be (2^2)*(3^3) = 108.
What you can be certain of, if X and Y are integers, is that Y is
divisible by 4, and the same must be true of X.
Neo2000 wrote:
You can therefore say that if X^3 = 16Y then Y = 4 and X = 4 since 16 = 4^2 and you need another 4 to satisfy the given equation.
The logic is also problematic- you really do need to get down to prime factors here. If instead you have the equation:
X^3 = 64Y
by the logic quoted above, you might then say "since 64 = 8^2, you need another 8 to satisfy the equation", and conclude that Y must be divisible by 8. This would not be correct, of course. Y could be 1, and X could be 4, to give one example. You must break down to primes, and only then look at the exponents.