BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

4 times it’s supplement

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Mon Aug 30, 2010 3:12 am
An angle exceeds 4 times it's supplement. Find the new angle formed if supplement is 30 degree.

A. 180
B. 200
C. 270
D. 330
E. None of these



[spoiler]Source: https://gmat.jumbotests.com[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Rahul@gurome » Mon Aug 30, 2010 3:42 am
sanju09 wrote:An angle exceeds 4 times it's supplement. Find the new angle formed if supplement is 30 degree.

A. 180
B. 200
C. 270
D. 330
E. None of these

[spoiler]Source: https://gmat.jumbotests.com[/spoiler]
Two angles are supplementary if their sum is 180º. So, other angle is 180º - 30º = 150º
Therefore, new angle formed = 150º + 4*30º = 150º + 120º = 270º

The correct answer is [spoiler](C)[/spoiler].
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by brijesh » Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:37 am
Thank you for the reply, but while reading the Q statement I could not understand about which angle it is talking about.

In Q`s statement : An angle is 4 times its supplement ( i.e. that angle is 30x 4= 120)

Find the new angle formed....this sentence seems vague. It is not distinctly telling about the angle (120+150)

plz explain?
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Mon Aug 30, 2010 8:12 pm
brijesh wrote:Thank you for the reply, but while reading the Q statement I could not understand about which angle it is talking about.

In Q`s statement : An angle is 4 times its supplement ( i.e. that angle is 30x 4= 120)

Find the new angle formed....this sentence seems vague. It is not distinctly telling about the angle (120+150)

plz explain?
If x is the angle in stem, then 180 - x is its supplement. By definition, the new angle formed is x + 4 (180 - x); when 180 - x is 30, x is 150, and the new angle formed is

= x + 4 (180 - x)

= 150 + 4 (30)

= 150 + 120

= [spoiler]270

C

I am also not finding the wordings as evenly understood by one and all. Let's thank the source only.
[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Tue Aug 31, 2010 4:24 am
sanju09 wrote:An angle exceeds 4 times it's supplement. Find the new angle formed if supplement is 30 degree.

A. 180
B. 200
C. 270
D. 330
E. None of these

[spoiler]Source: https://gmat.jumbotests.com[/spoiler]
I often see badly worded questions on this forum, but this one is among the worst. The word 'exceeds', for example, suggests we have an inequality here, but they clearly intend for the information to give an equation. The word 'it's' shouldn't have an apostrophe. It's an utter mystery, when they talk about 'the new angle formed', what angle they could possibly mean. And I could go on.

Not only is the question impenetrably written, it also tests material irrelevant to the GMAT (you don't need to know what a 'supplemental angle' is), so there is no reason to spend any time on it.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by Arcane66 » Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:20 pm
Ian Stewart wrote:
I often see badly worded questions on this forum, but this one is among the worst. The word 'exceeds', for example, suggests we have an inequality here, but they clearly intend for the information to give an equation. The word 'it's' shouldn't have an apostrophe. It's an utter mystery, when they talk about 'the new angle formed', what angle they could possibly mean. And I could go on.

Not only is the question impenetrably written, it also tests material irrelevant to the GMAT (you don't need to know what a 'supplemental angle' is), so there is no reason to spend any time on it.
Could not agree more, Ian.
Join the discussion