BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

4^(n + 1) + x and 4^(2 n) – x are divisible by 5

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Tue Oct 12, 2010 5:55 am
For what least value of x, both 4^(n + 1) + x and 4^(2 n) - x are divisible by 5, n is an even positive integer?
(A) 0
(B) 1
(C) 2
(D) 3
(E) 4


[spoiler]Made up[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by deepaks04 » Tue Oct 12, 2010 6:17 am
For n=2, minimum value of x=1

number having unit digit in 0 or 5 are divisible by 5

No power raise to 4 will give 0 as unit digit, so option A is ruled out

Ans. B) 1
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Tue Oct 12, 2010 10:17 pm
deepaks04 wrote:For n=2, minimum value of x=1

number having unit digit in 0 or 5 are divisible by 5

No power raise to 4 will give 0 as unit digit, so option A is ruled out

Ans. B) 1
B is right, but a better explanation is still awaited.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:39 am
sanju09 wrote:For what least value of x, both 4^(n + 1) + x and 4^(2 n) - x are divisible by 5, n is an even positive integer?
(A) 0
(B) 1
(C) 2
(D) 3
(E) 4


[spoiler]Made up[/spoiler]
4^(n + 1) will always end with a 4 in its unit digits provided n is an even positive integer. So we need X to be 1 so that

4^(n + 1) + x is divisible by 5

4^(2 n) always end with 6 in its unit's digits provided n is an even positive integer. So we need X to be 1 so that

4^(2 n) - x is divisible by 5.

But Sanju, only 1 can satisfy the given condition.. why all other options?? Not sure whether i was rite! feeling sleepy

I think u can modify the options like 1,6,11,16...
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:28 pm
sanju09 wrote:For what least value of x, both 4^(n + 1) + x and 4^(2 n) - x are divisible by 5, n is an even positive integer?
(A) 0
(B) 1
(C) 2
(D) 3
(E) 4
Hi sanju09,

Nice idea for a problem, and I guess gmatmachoman "got the picture" and realized that the "key" was controlling the unit´s digit of the integer powers of 4...

Just a small detail: I guess you should have put that x is (for instance) a non-negative integer in the question stem, otherwise it is not hard to see that x=-4 is also possible, and also x=-4-5=-9 , x=-14, etc...
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:41 pm
fskilnik wrote:
sanju09 wrote:For what least value of x, both 4^(n + 1) + x and 4^(2 n) - x are divisible by 5, n is an even positive integer?
(A) 0
(B) 1
(C) 2
(D) 3
(E) 4
Hi sanju09,

Nice idea for a problem, and I guess gmatmachoman "got the picture" and realized that the "key" was controlling the unit´s digit of the integer powers of 4...

Just a small detail: I guess you should have put that x is (for instance) a non-negative integer in the question stem, otherwise it is not hard to see that x=-4 is also possible, and also x=-4-5=-9 , x=-14, etc...
Thank you very much fskilnik for liking the idea, yeah gmatmachoman did justice with that and he came up with a nice suggestion too. Although, we can ignore his this statement that "4^(2 n) always end with 6 in its unit's digits provided n is an even positive integer", but we cannot ignore his suggestion to modify answers, really; let's not forget that he was feeling sleepy too.

I must confess in the end that the question should have been worded as under:

For what least non-negative integer value of x, both 4^(n + 1) + x and 4^(2 n) - x are divisible by 5, n is an even positive integer?
(A) 0
(B) 1
(C) 2
(D) 3
(E) 4


Thanks
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:03 am
sanju09 wrote:Thanks
My pleasure! (Sorry for this delay; I did not see you reply till now!!)
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by goyalsau » Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:08 am
fskilnik wrote:
Just a small detail: I guess you should have put that x is (for instance) a non-negative integer in the question stem, otherwise it is not hard to see that x=-4 is also possible, and also x=-4-5=-9 , x=-14, etc...
I must say you have a excellent approach, Its been pleasure reading all your comments and suggestions.....

Every now and then you prove the point that are very critical..
Thanks a lot
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:20 am
goyalsau wrote:
fskilnik wrote:
Just a small detail: I guess you should have put that x is (for instance) a non-negative integer in the question stem, otherwise it is not hard to see that x=-4 is also possible, and also x=-4-5=-9 , x=-14, etc...
I must say you have a excellent approach, Its been pleasure reading all your comments and suggestions.....

Every now and then you prove the point that are very critical..
Thanks a lot
Thank YOU for your kind words, goyalsau!

All the best,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion