BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

4 and 2 unique property?

Expert replies
by ashblog02 » Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:11 pm
Any decimal that has a finite number of non-zero digits is a terminating decimal. for example, 24, 0.82, 5.096 are three terminating decimals. If r & s are positive integers and the ratio of r/s is expressed as a decimal, is r/s a termnating decimal?

1] 90<r<100
2] s=4

a. statement 1
b. statement 2 (ans)
c. both together
d. each statment alone
e. neither statement

I understood the ans for option 1 but why is option b sufficient? does 4 have a unique property that it does not result in terminating decimals where as 3 does??
or i ws thinking of 6 it does have recurring decimals numbers but then 2 does not, is this a unique property to some integers?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by selango » Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:24 pm
stmt2,

s=4

r/s=r*1/4

=r*0.25

Whatever values of r, the result is decimal with finite number of integers.

So B is sufficient.

whenever a odd number is divided by 2^n,it result in decimal with finite number of integers.
Last edited by selango on Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:03 pm
Great explanation, Selango - if I can just tack on a little bit, this is one case in which it may be particularly helpful to be able to think of division problems in a few ways.

Let's consider the possibility of 11 divided by 4. We could express that as:

11/4 (a fraction)

2 and 1/4 (a mixed number, in which we'll take the number of times that 4 goes in evenly to 11, and then take what's left and divide back by 4 as a fraction)

2 remainder 1 (much like the mixed number but we leave the remainder as is and don't divide it back in)

2.25 (we take the mixed number and actually calculate it to a decimal place)


The GMAT likes to test your flexibility with these ways of expressing division, and this problem is a good example. r/s, if s = 4, is r/4. With that, to find the decimal we'd take whatever the remainder is and divide it back by 4. Those possibilities are:

No remainder --> Nothing after the decimal place.
Remainder 1 --> 1/4 ---> .25
Remainder 2 --> 1/2 ----> .5
Remainder 3 --> 3/4 ---> .75

Had they asked about a different value of s, we could try the same thing until we either found a repeating and a terminal decimal or recognized that we wouldn't. Say that s were 6, we'd have:

Remainder 1 ---> 1/6 ---> .166666......
Remainder 2 ---> 2/6 ---> 1/3 ---> .333333..........
Remainder 3 ----> 3/6 ---> 1/2 ----> .5

Now we have both a terminal decimal (.5) and a repeating decimal (.16666...), so this one wouldn't be sufficient.



I'd say that this question is much more about your ability to recognize the concept behind division than it is about knowing particular rules for numbers - once you know the concept the trial-and-error for the division shouldn't be that time-consuming or difficult, but the real catch is recognizing that if they're asking about division in a more conceptual framework you should be thinking about that relationship between remainder, fraction, and decimal.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Join the discussion