BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

20 k is divisible

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:10 am
If k is a positive integer, then 20 k is divisible by how many different positive integers?

(1) k is prime.

(2) k = 7.



OA B
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by sacx » Wed Apr 08, 2009 7:29 am
Stmt I

k is prime

if k = 11, then 20k has 3 different prime numbers (2,5 and 11)

if k = 2 or 5 then 20k has only 2 different prime numbers ( 2 and 5)

Insuff

Stmt II

k = 7

20 k has 3 different prime numbers (2,5,7)

[spoiler]Suff

B[/spoiler]
SACX
Join the discussion

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:06 pm
stmt 1 is insufficient coz

if k is prime it can be 2 also.
if it is 2 then total number of intergers dividing 20k does not change.
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:22 pm
stmt 1 is insufficient coz

if k is prime it can be 2 also.
if it is 2 then total number of intergers dividing 20k does not change.
Even I missed this point actually

Thanks a lot

by the way there can be a twist to this problem:

if k was an integer>2

ie: k>2

so answer would be D

I know that we are only suppose to discuss the questions which are posted rather than to bring our input, but what's the harm in knowing the variety of ways one particular question can be framed

Karan
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:34 pm
@@Karan,

Sorry to open an old thread. I don't think that the answer to this problem would be 'D' if it was given that k > 2

The question is asking for "different positive integers" not "different positive prime factors"

Please correct if I am wrong.

Thanks,
Vikas
gmat740 wrote:
stmt 1 is insufficient coz

if k is prime it can be 2 also.
if it is 2 then total number of intergers dividing 20k does not change.
Even I missed this point actually

Thanks a lot

by the way there can be a twist to this problem:

if k was an integer>2

ie: k>2

so answer would be D

I know that we are only suppose to discuss the questions which are posted rather than to bring our input, but what's the harm in knowing the variety of ways one particular question can be framed

Karan
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:35 am
Please note:

If X is a positive composite integer such that X = A^α × B^β × C^γ × D^δ......, where A, B, C, D... are distinct primes and α, β, γ, δ... are positive integers, then the total number of positive divisors of X will be given by

(α + 1) (β + 1) (γ + 1)(δ + 1)...
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by woo » Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:35 am
Yep I agree with mehravikas..
Answer is D if condition 1 says k is a prime greater than 5.
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:40 am
In X = A^α × B^β × C^γ × D^δ......, read '×' as 'multiplied by'.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion