BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

2 raffle tickets

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Mar 27, 2016 3:27 pm
Did one of the 3 members of a certain team sell at least 2 raffle tickets yesterday?

1. The 3 members sold a total of 6 raffle tickets yesterday.
2. No 2 of the members sold the same number of raffle tickets yesterday
Statement 1:
If NONE of the members sells at least 2 tickets, then the 3 members sell a maximum of 1 ticket each, yielding the following total:
1+1+1 = 3.
Too small, since the total number of tickets sold = 6.
Implication:
For a total of 6 tickets to be sold, one of the 3 members must sell at least 2 tickets.
SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2:
LEAST possible case for the 3 members:
0 ticket, 1 ticket, 2 tickets.
The least possible case includes one member selling 2 tickets.
Implication:
For no two members to sell the same number of tickets, one of the 3 members must sell at least 2 tickets.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by neeti2711 » Fri Jul 22, 2016 8:03 am
Can't we assume that one member did not any ticket?
Join the discussion

by neeti2711 » Fri Jul 22, 2016 8:04 am
Can't we assume that one member did not any ticket? Since we are talking about a TEAM of 3 members - Can we replace "3 members" in statement 1 with "The Team"? I guess the answer will change then
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Fri Jul 22, 2016 8:25 am
neeti2711 wrote:Can't we assume that one member did not any ticket?

We can - Mitch actually considered that scenario when evaluating statement 2.

Statement two tells us that they all sold a different number of tickets.

The minimum that the first member sold: 0 tickets.
The minimum that the second member sold, given that this must be different than the number the first sold: 1 ticket.
The minimum that the third member sold, given that this must be different than the number the first two sold: 2 tickets.

Therefore we know that someone has to have sold at least two tickets.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by neeti2711 » Fri Jul 22, 2016 9:34 am
Is there any specific knowledge required to solve this question? (May be about selling raffle tickets)

Why aren't we considering the possibility 1+1+4 or 0+2+4?
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Fri Jul 22, 2016 10:58 am
neeti2711 wrote:Is there any specific knowledge required to solve this question? (May be about selling raffle tickets)

Why aren't we considering the possibility 1+1+4 or 0+2+4?
For statement 1, you can consider those possibilities. But we're trying to determine if anyone sold at least two tickets. In both scenarios you've offered, the answer is YES, someone did sell at least two tickets. And no matter what scenario you consider to statement 1, the answer will always be YES, thus the statement is sufficient to answer the question. (Remember that sufficiency = consistency. If the answer to a YES/NO question is always YES, you have sufficiency. And if the answer is always NO you have sufficiency. It's when the answer could be YES or NO that a statement is not sufficient to answer the question.)
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion