BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

2 min question again :)

Expert replies

by VP_RedSoxFan » Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:41 am
Not sure I want to get in the middle of this, but, literally, I'm in the middle of this. I consider myself a realist and teach students both methods. Admittedly, I strongly urge students to learn the math, do the math accurately and learn why something is correct mathematically. I really feel that it has the biggest payoff on test day.

However, I'm a realist and will expose my students to backsolving techniques so that on test day, when they're staring at the screen and the algebra escapes them, they have something to lean on. Like Ian, I believe that elite scores go to those who do the math quickly and accurately.

I think it is akin to Sentence Correction questions. Eliminations strategies are better than nothing, but the best scores go to those students with a strong command of grammatical and idiomatic rules.
Ryan S.
| GMAT Instructor |
Elite GMAT Preparation and Admissions Consulting
www.VeritasPrep.com

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:36 am
VP_RedSoxFan wrote:Not sure I want to get in the middle of this, but, literally, I'm in the middle of this.
Don't mean to start anything serious here(!)- I only hope to have a good-natured discussion of how to best succeed on the test.
VP_RedSoxFan wrote: I consider myself a realist and teach students both methods. Admittedly, I strongly urge students to learn the math, do the math accurately and learn why something is correct mathematically. I really feel that it has the biggest payoff on test day.

However, I'm a realist and will expose my students to backsolving techniques so that on test day, when they're staring at the screen and the algebra escapes them, they have something to lean on. Like Ian, I believe that elite scores go to those who do the math quickly and accurately.

I think it is akin to Sentence Correction questions. Eliminations strategies are better than nothing, but the best scores go to those students with a strong command of grammatical and idiomatic rules.
I think the advice above is the best advice for the GMAT. I teach backsolving as well, but as a fallback strategy, not as a first port of call.
Join the discussion

by AleksandrM » Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:51 am
Thanks, that is an excellent application of algebra.
Join the discussion

by athinabean » Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:40 am
area of walkway = (3x+5)^2 - (x+5)^2 = 132

solving we get x = 3

Can somebody please show me how you got x=3 from the above? I cannot do ir for some reason and it is driving me crazy.
thanks.
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:05 am
athinabean wrote:area of walkway = (3x+5)^2 - (x+5)^2 = 132

solving we get x = 3

Can somebody please show me how you got x=3 from the above? I cannot do ir for some reason and it is driving me crazy.
thanks.
Note that the left side is a difference of squares: a^2 - b^2 = (a+b)(a-b).

So,
(3x+5)^2 - (x+5)^2 = 132

[(3x + 5) + (x + 5)][(3x + 5) - (x + 5)] = 132

(4x + 10)(2x) = 132

8x^2 + 20x = 132

2x^2 + 5x - 33 = 0

(2x + 11)(x - 3) = 0

x = 3, -5.5

Discard the negative solution; distances can't be negative.
Join the discussion

by netigen » Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:28 am
BTW roots for the e.q. can be found using the formula

x = [-b+-sqrt(b^2-4ac)]/2a

for an eq of the form ax^2+bx+c = 0
Join the discussion