Not sure I want to get in the middle of this, but, literally, I'm in the middle of this. I consider myself a realist and teach students both methods. Admittedly, I strongly urge students to learn the math, do the math accurately and learn why something is correct mathematically. I really feel that it has the biggest payoff on test day.
However, I'm a realist and will expose my students to backsolving techniques so that on test day, when they're staring at the screen and the algebra escapes them, they have something to lean on. Like Ian, I believe that elite scores go to those who do the math quickly and accurately.
I think it is akin to Sentence Correction questions. Eliminations strategies are better than nothing, but the best scores go to those students with a strong command of grammatical and idiomatic rules.
However, I'm a realist and will expose my students to backsolving techniques so that on test day, when they're staring at the screen and the algebra escapes them, they have something to lean on. Like Ian, I believe that elite scores go to those who do the math quickly and accurately.
I think it is akin to Sentence Correction questions. Eliminations strategies are better than nothing, but the best scores go to those students with a strong command of grammatical and idiomatic rules.
Ryan S.
| GMAT Instructor |
Elite GMAT Preparation and Admissions Consulting
www.VeritasPrep.com
Learn more about me
| GMAT Instructor |
Elite GMAT Preparation and Admissions Consulting
www.VeritasPrep.com
Learn more about me

















