BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

2 Gmat Prep Questions

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by raleigh » Sat May 30, 2009 6:24 pm
Are the integers z and f on the right of 0 on the number line?

Restatement: are z and f both positive?

(1) The product of z and f is positive.
Restatement: zf > 0.

Choose z = 1, f = 1. Then zf = 1 > 0, z > 0, f > 0.
Choose z = -1, f = -1. Then zf = 1 > 0, z < 0, f < 0.

Insufficient.

(2) The sum of z and f is positive.
Restatement z + f > 0.

Choose z = 2, f = -1. Then z + f = 1 > 0, z > 0, f < 0.
Choose z = 1, f = 1. Then z + f = 2 > 0, z > 0, f < 0.

Insufficient.

(1)+(2)
(1) zf > 0 tells us that z and f are non-zero. Also, it tells us that z and f are both positive or both negative.

(2) Rules out the case where z and f are both negative since a negative plus a negative is always negative.

So z and f are both positive, and hence to the right of zero on the number line. The answer is C.
Join the discussion

by exhilaration » Sat May 30, 2009 8:21 pm
raleigh wrote:Are the integers z and f on the right of 0 on the number line?

Restatement: are z and f both positive?

(1) The product of z and f is positive.
Restatement: zf > 0.

Choose z = 1, f = 1. Then zf = 1 > 0, z > 0, f > 0.
Choose z = -1, f = -1. Then zf = 1 > 0, z < 0, f < 0.

Insufficient.

(2) The sum of z and f is positive.
Restatement z + f > 0.

Choose z = 2, f = -1. Then z + f = 1 > 0, z > 0, f < 0.
Choose z = 1, f = 1. Then z + f = 2 > 0, z > 0, f < 0.

Insufficient.

(1)+(2)
(1) zf > 0 tells us that z and f are non-zero. Also, it tells us that z and f are both positive or both negative.

(2) Rules out the case where z and f are both negative since a negative plus a negative is always negative.

So z and f are both positive, and hence to the right of zero on the number line. The answer is C.
Thanks raleigh, that makes sense. I sometimes wonder what I was thinking during the exam.
Join the discussion

by raleigh » Sat May 30, 2009 8:56 pm
(2) didn't work out smoothly for me in the second problem. I'll look at it in the morning and see if I can put something together if someone doesn't crack it by then.
Join the discussion

by pratikgandhi » Sun May 31, 2009 2:40 am
Problem 2.

a. n^2/36 is an integer

which means n^2 = 36 * K where K is any integer

n^2 = 3*3*2*2*K

n= 3*2*underroot(K)

so n is divisible by 3

b. 144/n^2 is an integer

which means 144 = n^2 * K where K is any integer

3^2 * 2^4 = n^2 * K

n can be 3 or 2 or 4.. (when K is 16 or 36 or 9 respectively) so we cannot conclusively say whether n would be divisible by 3
trying for a perfect score... 800..
Join the discussion

by raleigh » Sun May 31, 2009 10:53 am
pratikgandhi wrote:Problem 2.

a. n^2/36 is an integer

which means n^2 = 36 * K where K is any integer

n^2 = 3*3*2*2*K

n= 3*2*underroot(K)

so n is divisible by 3
This is incorrect. Just because the number can be written with 3 in the product doesn't make it divisible by 3. Consider a number like 3*sqrt(2). It is NOT divisible by 3 since 3*sqrt(2)/3 = sqrt(2) is NOT an integer.

n is an integer so 3*2*sqrt(k) is an integer since they are equal. We have to prove that k is a perfect square which implies that sqrt(k) is an integer, and we are done.

The problem states that n is a positive integer. n^2/36 is a positive integer means there exists a positive integer k such that n^2/36=k.

Case k is a perfect square:
Then k=m^2 where m is an integer (you can argue that it must be positive, but that won't be important in the argument).

Then n = 2*3*sqrt(k) = 2*3*m so n is divisible by 3.

Case k is not a perfect square:
Assume k is not a perfect square. Then sqrt(k) is irrational. Prove by contradiction. Assume that n is divisible by 3. Then n/3=a where is a positive integer. So n = 3a.

We have two different ways to express the value of n. Set them equal to each other:

3a = 2*3* sqrt(k)
sqrt(k) = 3a/6
sqrt(k) = a/2

But a/2 of a rational number. This contradicts the fact that sqrt(k) is an irrational number (cannot be written as a ratio of integers). So k must be a perfect square.

You definitely shouldn't waste your time writing math proofs on the exam. I don't see a quick solution.
Join the discussion

by raleigh » Sun May 31, 2009 10:59 am
(2) is messier than (1). I'm going to make some coffee and look at this again; there has to be an easier way.
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:53 am
Statement (1)

n ^2 = (36 * 1)^2 or (36 * 2)^2 or (36 * 3)^3

For all, n is divisible by 3.

Sufficient

Statement (2)

144/n^2 = I (I = Integer)

144/I = n^2

Consider I = 144, we get n^2 = 1, n = 1. 1 is not divisible by 3.

Consider I = 4, we get n^2 = 36, n = 6. 6 is divisible by 3.

Insufficient
Join the discussion

by mike22629 » Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:25 am
According to Ron Purewal, always try to disprove DS.

For Second Statement,

144/n^2 = Integer

What if n = sqrt(12)

Then 144/n^2=12, but n is NOT divisble by 3

What is n = 12

Then 144/n^2 =1, and n IS divisible by 3

Hence Statement 2 is insufficient
Join the discussion

by ghacker » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:23 pm
Question 2

Statement I n^2/36 is an integer that means n^2 will have at least the factors of 36 so n^2 = 2^2*3^2*K for some positive integer K ,
we see that n^2 has 3^2 in it so n must have at least a 3 as a factor

n is divisible by 3 --------------------------- statement I is sufficient

statement II

N^2 must have at least one factor of 144 , ie: 1,2,3,6,16,4,12....

hence if n^2=1 n=1 but n is not divisible by 3 if n^2 = 144 , n=12 and n is divisible by 3 so statement II is insufficient
Join the discussion