BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000CR Test 3, Q 20

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:49 pm
by tallynik » Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:06 pm
The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.
When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.
Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?
(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.
(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.
(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

OA E

I am not sure if above is the right answer. I marked D.
Please help understand.
Thanks For Your Help
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pmFollowed by: 25 members
Thanked: 237 times
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:20 pm
I kept staring at this question and asked myself whether it was written in English or not..I will pass this one! :?
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
Thanked: 12 times

by nervesofsteel » Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:44 pm
The answer should be E

Condition for giving a consent is that the person should know who all are competing.

as per the last condition , if it is not possible to know nominees in advance.. Then No one can nominate as second condition leads to contradiction with first condition.

Hope it helps.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:51 pm
i came across this question few months back and i must say its an absolute beauty...

later i came across a impeccable explanation for the same, found from esnips...


explanation:
Suppose that there are only two Prospective nominees A & B.

We approach A to get his consent to become a nominee. Now according to the proposal before taking the consent from A, he must be told that the other nominee is B. But B has not given his consent yet. So to get consent from A we need to take consent from B.

Now we approach B. Here again before taking B's consent we must tell him that A is the other nominee. But we have not taken consent from A yet.

This scenario will lead us where we can't get consent from any prospective nominee and therefore if there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

Hence E.

i hope this helps..
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:34 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 25 times

by aj5105 » Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:06 am
nice 1 - thanks.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

by stop@800 » Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:47 am
A deadlock situation :)
raunekk wrote:i came across this question few months back and i must say its an absolute beauty...

later i came across a impeccable explanation for the same, found from esnips...


explanation:
Suppose that there are only two Prospective nominees A & B.

We approach A to get his consent to become a nominee. Now according to the proposal before taking the consent from A, he must be told that the other nominee is B. But B has not given his consent yet. So to get consent from A we need to take consent from B.

Now we approach B. Here again before taking B's consent we must tell him that A is the other nominee. But we have not taken consent from A yet.

This scenario will lead us where we can't get consent from any prospective nominee and therefore if there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

Hence E.

i hope this helps..
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 160
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:09 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 1 times

by Sharma_Gaurav » Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:07 am
does anyone know what level question this one would be on an actual gmat exam ?
I guess it is 700 + level, and i would have guessed it, depending on time .
But agree it is a dead lock and hence answer is E.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1