BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Marsupial Lions

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:39 pm
Location: Barcelona
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:640

Marsupial Lions

by hk » Fri May 08, 2009 7:19 am
Another one...

A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation period of only 39 days. At this stage, the joey's hind limbs are not well developed, but its forelimbs are well developed, so that it can can climb from the cloaca into its mother's pouch for further development. The recent discovery that ancient marsupial lions were also born with only their forelimbs developed supports the hypothesis that newborn marsupial lions must also have needed to climb into their mothers' pouches.

The argument in this passage relies on which of the following assumptions?



A) All animals that are born after a short gestation period are born with some parts of their bodies underdeveloped.

B) Well developed forelimbs would have been more advantageous to ancient marsupial lions than well developed hind limbs would have been.

C) If the newborn marsupial lion did not climb into its mother's pouch, then paleontologists would be able to find evidence that it did so.

D) Newborn marsupial lions that crawled into their mothers' pouches could not have done so had they not had only their forelimbs developed at birth.

E) Newborn marsupial lions would not have had only their forelegs developed if this development were of no use to the marsupial lions.
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 145
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:18 am
Location: United Kingdom
Thanked: 5 times

by poonam1279 » Fri May 08, 2009 7:38 am
D) Newborn marsupial lions that crawled into their mothers' pouches could not have done so had they not had only their forelimbs developed at birth.
GMAT PREP 2-630
MGMAT (2):630
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pm
Thanked: 104 times
Followed by:1 members

by scoobydooby » Fri May 08, 2009 8:27 am
would go for E
developed forelimbs help marsupial lions climbs into pouches

A. out of scope

B. out of scope

C. out of scope

D. we do not know if "having only forelimbs" is neccessary for climbing into pouches.

E. correct IMO, says only function of the forelimbs in newborn marsupial lions is to climb in pouches. negate- if newborn lions had developed forelimbs which were useless (which did not help them in climbing into pouches)-argument falls apart

theres a similar question in OG-11 about bats and blood vessels in their wings
Last edited by scoobydooby on Fri May 08, 2009 10:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 431
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:32 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:1 members

by kanha81 » Fri May 08, 2009 8:59 am
IMO [spoiler][D][/spoiler]. It directly strenghtens the hypothesis, so there is no point in negating and redirecting against the conclusion to weaken. [spoiler][D][/spoiler] fills in the blank.

what is OA?
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 7:01 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by ManSab » Fri May 08, 2009 9:37 am
..its forelimbs are well developed, so that it can can climb from the cloaca into its mother's pouch for further development

my pick D! --> strengthens the above premise.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 4:14 pm
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:760

by rs2010 » Fri May 08, 2009 10:07 am
One more for D.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:48 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:740

Re: Marsupial Lions

by 2010gmat » Fri May 08, 2009 10:48 am
hk wrote:Another one...

A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation period of only 39 days. At this stage, the joey's hind limbs are not well developed, but its forelimbs are well developed, so that it can can climb from the cloaca into its mother's pouch for further development. The recent discovery that ancient marsupial lions were also born with only their forelimbs developed supports the hypothesis that newborn marsupial lions must also have needed to climb into their mothers' pouches.

The argument in this passage relies on which of the following assumptions?

IMO C, :shock:



A) All animals that are born after a short gestation period are born with some parts of their bodies underdeveloped.

B) Well developed forelimbs would have been more advantageous to ancient marsupial lions than well developed hind limbs would have been.

C) If the newborn marsupial lion did not climb into its mother's pouch, then paleontologists would be able to find evidence that it did so.

D) Newborn marsupial lions that crawled into their mothers' pouches could not have done so had they not had only their forelimbs developed at birth.

E) Newborn marsupial lions would not have had only their forelegs developed if this development were of no use to the marsupial lions.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Fri May 08, 2009 4:26 pm
Argument talks about climb and option D talks about crawled....

IMO - C
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:40 am
Location: Hyderabad

by preetosh » Sat May 09, 2009 3:36 am
i too opt for D.
What is OA ?

thnx
Top
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 5:57 am
Location: Taiwan

by Steppanyaki » Sat May 09, 2009 4:30 am
I agree with Scoobydooby - E.

The question structure and logic is so similar to the question in OG11 about bats and blood vessels.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:04 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:620

by bmlaud » Sun May 10, 2009 3:47 am
IMO D

The argument assumes that there is no other way to climb the pouches.

Option E is misleading - it is analogous to say Marsupial lions had tails, whiskers or nails because lions needed those for their development. It may not be true though.
"Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 160
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 1:17 am
Location: Rourkela/Hyderabad
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by sanp_l » Sun May 10, 2009 5:26 am
One more D.

How do i know if i am correct ? The thread starter might have the right answer i guess.
Sandy
Top
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 5:57 am
Location: Taiwan

by Steppanyaki » Sun May 10, 2009 7:55 am
Ok, I reread the OG question about bats. The focus seems to be different even though the structure is incredibly similar.

But D does seem to make more sense here.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:00 am
Thanked: 4 times

by agoyal2 » Sun May 10, 2009 9:19 am
IMO E, Whats the OA?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:57 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by thetrystero » Sun May 10, 2009 10:21 pm
A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation period of only 39 days. At this stage, the joey's hind limbs are not well developed, but its forelimbs are well developed, so that it can can climb from the cloaca into its mother's pouch for further development. The recent discovery that ancient marsupial lions were also born with only their forelimbs developed supports the hypothesis that newborn marsupial lions must also have needed to climb into their mothers' pouches.

The argument in this passage relies on which of the following assumptions?



A) All animals that are born after a short gestation period are born with some parts of their bodies underdeveloped.

B) Well developed forelimbs would have been more advantageous to ancient marsupial lions than well developed hind limbs would have been.

C) If the newborn marsupial lion did not climb into its mother's pouch, then paleontologists would be able to find evidence that it did so.

D) Newborn marsupial lions that crawled into their mothers' pouches could not have done so had they not had only their forelimbs developed at birth.

E) Newborn marsupial lions would not have had only their forelegs developed if this development were of no use to the marsupial lions.
Situation:
1. joeys are born with well developed forelegs, under developed hind legs.
2. this allows it climb into pouch.
3. baby marsupials also have similarly relative development levels in fore vs hind legs.
4. therefore, they must have needed to climb in to pouch too.

A,B,C: not relevant to argument
D. this is saying that if they had a full range of motion, it would have been harder for them move than if they were crippled in the hind legs.
E. the similar leg development could well have been of no evolutionary purpose to the marsupials even though they served a purpose for the joey.

My answer: E
Top
Post new topic Post Reply