BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Marsupial Lions

Expert replies

by anshulseth » Sun May 10, 2009 10:39 pm
@hk, could you please post the OA and OE, to end this confusion.
Asset
Join the discussion

Re: Marsupial Lions

by vinaynp » Mon May 11, 2009 12:32 am
hk wrote:Another one...

A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation period of only 39 days. At this stage, the joey's hind limbs are not well developed, but its forelimbs are well developed, so that it can can climb from the cloaca into its mother's pouch for further development. The recent discovery that ancient marsupial lions were also born with only their forelimbs developed supports the hypothesis that newborn marsupial lions must also have needed to climb into their mothers' pouches.

The argument in this passage relies on which of the following assumptions?



A) All animals that are born after a short gestation period are born with some parts of their bodies underdeveloped.

B) Well developed forelimbs would have been more advantageous to ancient marsupial lions than well developed hind limbs would have been.

C) If the newborn marsupial lion did not climb into its mother's pouch, then paleontologists would be able to find evidence that it did so.

D) Newborn marsupial lions that crawled into their mothers' pouches could not have done so had they not had only their forelimbs developed at birth.

E) Newborn marsupial lions would not have had only their forelegs developed if this development were of no use to the marsupial lions.
A) => No proof of lion being born in gestation. Let us for a moment assume that a lion is born in in gestation. However, we cannot generalize to include all animals.

B) => No proof of being more advantageous.

C)=> Out of scope.

D)=> Could be. However, E) comes very close.

E)=> joey's hind limbs are not well developed, but its forelimbs are well developed, so that it can can climb from the cloaca into its mother's pouch for further development.

This means that forelimbs were developed for a cause. Hence, I would go with E)
Join the discussion

by hk » Mon May 11, 2009 7:13 am
I'm sorry for not posting the OA sooner.. The OA is E..

Here is my reasoning:

The passage says about New Born Kangaroo - "its forelimbs are well developed, so that it can can climb from the cloaca into its mother's pouch for further development."

And then tries to relate this with the Marsupial Lion, concluding that "newborn marsupial lions must also have needed to climb into their mothers' pouches" due to the only reason that "ancient marsupial lions were also born with only their forelimbs developed" So here the assumption is that the Hindlimbs served no other purpose than to Climb into their mom's!!
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 12:59 pm
E seems to be the best choice here
Join the discussion