i m not expert my friend but i will try to explain
increase in religiosity in college in last ten years.......this must be the reason for reduction in the cheating
find the option which oppose this
1.doest not say about cheating out
2.does not say about religiosity
3.this may be the reason for reduction in cheating wins
4.out of scope
5.but there is a reduction in cheating out
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
Need explanation
Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning |
Hey Joanna - I also am not an expert but here are my two cents.
The argument proposes a causal relationship. The "cause" is increased religiosity. Note: The cause is not students attending church. It is "religiosity" or a spirit of faith. The "effect" is lower cheating.
You can weaken this conclusion by showing that the cause/effect relationship is not valid or by finding an alternative cause for the lower cheating.
Answer C looks attractive as an alternative cause but the dates don't match up. The change to proctor exams happened fifteen years ago and the reduction in cheating is "recent"
Answer A shows that the cause/effect relationship may not be valid. If the students attend church only for social reasons then they do not have increased religiosity. Therefore, the conclusion falls apart that religiosity is the reason for less cheating.
Hope that helps...
The argument proposes a causal relationship. The "cause" is increased religiosity. Note: The cause is not students attending church. It is "religiosity" or a spirit of faith. The "effect" is lower cheating.
You can weaken this conclusion by showing that the cause/effect relationship is not valid or by finding an alternative cause for the lower cheating.
Answer C looks attractive as an alternative cause but the dates don't match up. The change to proctor exams happened fifteen years ago and the reduction in cheating is "recent"
Answer A shows that the cause/effect relationship may not be valid. If the students attend church only for social reasons then they do not have increased religiosity. Therefore, the conclusion falls apart that religiosity is the reason for less cheating.
Hope that helps...













