BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Yorco and Zortech

Expert replies

by kstv » Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:27 am
If it is D then why not A.
Both bring new info into the discussion

Infact in the Paragraph
Yorco --------------------spends a far higher total sum per year on wages for such workers.

D. overtime work, which is paid at a substantially higher rate than work done
during the regular work week, is rare at both Yorco and Zortech
Substantially higher rates paid rarely will not lead to far higher sum among large number of full time workers. The effect should be nominal.

A. Zortech spends a higher total sum per year than Yorco does to provide its
hourly wage workers with benefits other than wages
All other things being equal the higher total sum benefits not included in wages paid by Zortech is compensation for higher hourly wages , on average, at Yorco than at Zortech.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:47 am
But you have to pay attention to WHAT they are spending a higher sum on:
Yorco --------------------spends a far higher total sum per year on wages for such workers.
Beneits OTHER THAN wages are outside the scope of the argument.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:58 am
Testluv wrote:But you have to pay attention to WHAT they are spending a higher sum on:
Yorco --------------------spends a far higher total sum per year on wages for such workers.
Beneits OTHER THAN wages are outside the scope of the argument.
Can anyone please explain why C is wrong here with proper reasons.

Thanks in advance!!
Best-
Amit
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:00 am
ssgmatter wrote:
Testluv wrote:But you have to pay attention to WHAT they are spending a higher sum on:
Yorco --------------------spends a far higher total sum per year on wages for such workers.
Beneits OTHER THAN wages are outside the scope of the argument.
Can anyone please explain why C is wrong here with proper reasons.

Thanks in advance!!
I think C only talks about the hourly wage employees and not other types of workers....Am I right??
Best-
Amit
Join the discussion

by arora007 » Tue Jul 27, 2010 4:51 am
I had just 2 seconds to complete this question...and got it D.

gmatmachoman's explanation makes sense.... but IMO A,

See mathematically... ppl working for Y = ppl working for Z.


hourly wages of Y = (Fixed benefits + hourly wages) of Z

assumed the above , since this question will fall into the assumptions question category.

so it would mean hourly wages of Y would be more.

Does this choice also not solve part of the jig-saw puzzle..??
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion