Newton First or Leibniz first

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

Newton First or Leibniz first

by maihuna » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:08 am
Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz' that discuss one of Newton's books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton's calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz' own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false. A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however. ]Leibniz' notes are limited to early sections of Newton's book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton's calculus concepts and techniques are presented.
In the historian's reasoning, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends; the second is evidence that has been used to support an opposing position.
B. The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends; the second is that position.
C. The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends; the second provides evidence against that intermediate conclusion.
D. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is evidence offered in support of the historian's own position.
E. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is further information that substantiates that evidence.
[spoiler]Answer:D[/spoiler]
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:42 am
Thanked: 11 times
Followed by:1 members

by hitmewithgmat » Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:51 pm
IMO is D.
Basically this argument divides into two parts.
Scholars/historians.
Historians say that scholars conclude that it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false based on FIRST BOLD sentence.
However, historians conclude that a more cautious conclusion is needed based on SECOND BOLD sentence.

Therefore, in order to find the answer, you need to keep this two divergent view in mind.

and Bam, D. that's what D says.
<The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is evidence offered in support of the historians own position.>
Disclaimer-I am not a GMAT savvy yet, but I am learning everyday with my fellow beatthegmat citizens.

I AM DETERMINED TO CRASH/NIX OUT/ATTACK BRUTALLY/CRACK VERBAL PART OF GMAT. ROAR!

Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

by maihuna » Thu Dec 24, 2009 11:11 am
D is fine, but criticize in D make me worry, is author tone is that of criticizm? TestLuv please help.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 539 times
Followed by:164 members
GMAT Score:800

by Testluv » Thu Dec 24, 2009 1:56 pm
Most boldface questions will involve opposing viewpoints. Quite frequently, the author will be out to argue against (ie, criticize) someone else's argument.

Here, we learn that some people are trying to argue that Leibniz copied Newton. They argue this because some of Leibniz' notes have Netwon's treatment of calculus.

But the author is out to argue against this viewpoint, to criticize it. He is saying: "yah, fine but hold on just a second; yes, some of Leibniz' notes have Newton's stuff BUT that was just stuff that was from early in Newton's book. So, you guys shouldn't jump to conclusions, and it may well be that each of them developed their calculus independently."
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto