MGMAT CAT - Inference

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 177
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:39 pm
Thanked: 6 times

MGMAT CAT - Inference

by okigbo » Sat Feb 27, 2010 4:23 am
Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee won by correctly spelling the spoken word Ursprache, which means "fame" in German. Given the richness of our language, why must we resort to words taken from modern foreign languages to challenge our best spellers? Ursprache is listed in our dictionary, as are words from many other foreign languages, but future spelling bees should limit themselves to words in our dictionary that have been anglicized in all aspects because spelling English words, not knowledge of linguistics and international phonetics, is the point of these contests.

Which of the following can most reasonably be inferred from the argument above?

a. The spelling contest winner knew how to spell most of the anglicized words in the dictionary.
b. Foreign words are more difficult than anglicized words for all contestants to spell.
c. Spelling contestant winners should be determined by their facility with all aspects of language.
d. To spell foreign words, contestants must recognize the language and know its pronunciation.
e. The English language contains more borrowed words than most other languages.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:43 am
Location: Estland

by gryynwald » Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:28 am

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:54 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:3 members

by outreach » Sat Feb 27, 2010 9:09 am
a)Incorrect : this cannot be inferred as no quantitative data is provided to prove this point
b)Incorrect : can be correct. But "all contestants " to strong usage
c)Incorrect : this is in contrast to what columinist is saying. columinist is stressing on some points
d)Correct : bingo. Columinist mentions that "knowledge of linguistics and international phonetics" is presently tested
e)Incorrect : this cannot be inferred as no quantitative data is provided to prove this point
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:09 pm
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

by akahuja143 » Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:27 pm
IMO D

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:23 pm
I think C must be true

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:43 am

by sarthak » Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:09 pm
IMO D.. what is OA ?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Fri Mar 19, 2010 3:05 am
okigbo wrote:Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee won by correctly spelling the spoken word Ursprache, which means "fame" in German. Given the richness of our language, why must we resort to words taken from modern foreign languages to challenge our best spellers? Ursprache is listed in our dictionary, as are words from many other foreign languages, but future spelling bees should limit themselves to words in our dictionary that have been anglicized in all aspects because spelling English words, not knowledge of linguistics and international phonetics, is the point of these contests.

Which of the following can most reasonably be inferred from the argument above?

The author argues that the point of spelling contests is spelling English words. The point of these contest is not about knowledge of language or phonetics (sounds, pronunciation). Lets see which answer choice comes close to this paraphrase.

a. The spelling contest winner knew how to spell most of the anglicized words in the dictionary.
Incorrect : Nothing in the passage implies that the spelling contest winner knew how to spell most of the anglicized words.

b. Foreign words are more difficult than anglicized words for all contestants to spell.
Incorrect : Difficulty level of foreign words for all the contestants is not mentioned in the passage.

c. Spelling contestant winners should be determined by their facility with all aspects of language.
Incorrect : The passage only says that future spelling bees should limit themselves to words in our dictionary that have been anglicized in all aspects. This clearly does not mean that winners should be determined by the facility with ALL ASPECTS OF LANGUAGE.

d. To spell foreign words, contestants must recognize the language and know its pronunciation.
Correct : This answer choice comes close to our paraphrase above.

e. The English language contains more borrowed words than most other languages.
Incorrect : We cannot infer this from the passage.