Technological education is worsening

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:28 am
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:710

Technological education is worsening

by airan » Sat Jun 14, 2008 3:59 am
Technological education is worsening. People between eighteen and twenty-four, who are just emerging from their formal education, are more likely to be technologically illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, issues for public referenda will increasingly involve aspects of technology.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

(A) If all young people are to make informed decisions on public referenda, many of them must learn more about technology.

(B) Thorough studies of technological issues and innovations should be made a required part of the public and private school curriculum.

(C) It should be suggested that prospective voters attend applied science courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in technical matters.

(D)If young people are not to be overly influenced by famous technocrats, they must increase their knowledge of pure science.

(E) On public referenda issues, young people tend to confuse real or probable technologies with impossible ideals.
Thanks
Airan
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:44 am
Thanked: 26 times

by chidcguy » Sat Jun 14, 2008 6:40 am
My pick A

(A) If all young people are to make informed decisions on public referenda, many of them must learn more about technology.

Keep aside as its not too harsh

(B) Thorough studies of technological issues and innovations should be made a required part of the public and private school curriculum.

Should be made - strong words for conclusion

(C) It should be suggested that prospective voters attend applied science courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in technical matters.

Prospective voters?? Is that a stretch? I am not sure. Applied science courses?? Is applied science == technological aspects. Confusing keep aside

(D)If young people are not to be overly influenced by famous technocrats, they must increase their knowledge of pure science.

again must increase and also goes out of the scope of their knowledge vs influence

(E) On public referenda issues, young people tend to confuse real or probable technologies with impossible ideals.

Out of scope to me as there are no ideals referred to in stimulus

I picked A between A & C as it conveys the meaning that with out good technical knowledge young people cannot make informed decisions

Legendary Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:59 am
Location: USA
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:1 members

by niraj_a » Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:41 am
A

I had to decide between A and B

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 2:29 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:750

by sulabh » Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:50 am
It is A hands down.Becuase issues for public referenda will increasingly involve aspects of technology, young people must learn more about technology to make informed decisions on public referenda.OA?

Cheers!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 11:23 pm
Location: Dubai
Thanked: 6 times

hmm..

by shipra » Thu Jun 19, 2008 6:35 am
if ALL have to be involved in public referenda, y shld MANY of them learn technology, y nt all...i think it shld b B....
if sum1 cld throw more light..it wl b awsum...

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

Re: hmm..

by Ian Stewart » Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:53 am
shipra wrote:if ALL have to be involved in public referenda, y shld MANY of them learn technology, y nt all...i think it shld b B....
if sum1 cld throw more light..it wl b awsum...
From the question, it is clear that some young people already do know about technology. For all young people to be informed, the rest will need to learn about technology-- it is not the case that all will need to learn about technology, since some already know about it.

Still, that's not the main reason why A is a much better answer than B. The question is: 'Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn?'. The question is not 'What policy decision would help to address this problem?' B offers a solution to the problem- not the only solution, mind you, but one possible solution. It's not a logical conclusion to draw from the facts presented; it's an opinion about what should be done about those facts.

On the other hand, A simply rephrases the information in the question; it's a perfectly logical conclusion to draw from the information presented.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:58 am

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 12:08 am
I believe the correct answer should be A.