BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolute Inequality fundamentals

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by BarryLi » Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:56 pm
An inequality that involves one absolute value has 2 cases to consider.
Since this inequality has two absolute values, there are 3 cases to consider.
I'll discuss why there are 3 cases below.

Let a represent (3+2x)
Let b represent (4-x)

Now suppose |a| > |b| represents the original equation |3 + 2x| > |4 - x|

The 4 possibilities are as follows:

1) a > b
2) a > -b
3) -a > b
4) -a > -b

However, note that (4) * (-1) is a < b, which is the same inequality as (1) but with the inequality sign reversed.
i.e. (1) is a > b, (4) is a < b
The same is true for (3) * (-1), in that it is is the same inequality as (2) but with the inequality sign reversed.
i.e. (2) is a > -b, (3) is a < -b

Considering that, only inequalities (1) and (2) will need to be simplified to identify the 3 cases to consider.

1) a > b
3 + 2x > 4 - x
3x > 1
x > (1/3)

2) a > -b
3 + 2x > -(4 - x)
3 + 2x > x - 4
x > -7

From these two inequalities, the 3 cases to consider for the value of x are:

1) x < -7
2) -7 < x < (1/3)
3) x > (1/3)

Values for each of those ranges for x need to be plugged into the original inequality to see if they work.
If they keep the inequality true, then the numbers in that range can be a value for x.

1) x = -8 (for x < -7)
|3 + 2x| > |4 - x|
|3 + 2(-8)| > |4 - (-8)|
|3 - 16| > |4 + 8|
13 > 12 is true
x = -8 satisfies the inequality, therefore all values for x < -7 satisfy the inequality.

2) x = -3 (for -7 < x < (1/3))
|3 + 2x| > |4 - x|
|3 + 2(-3)| > |4 - (-3)|
|3 - 6| > |4 + 3|
3 > 7 doesn't hold
x = - 3 doesn't satisfy the inequality, therefore all values for x in the range -7 < x < (1/3) do not satisfy the inequality.

3) x = 1 (for x > 1/3)
|3 + 2x| > |4 - x|
|3 + 2(1)| > |4 - (1)|
|3 + 2| > |4 - 1|
5 > 3 is true
x = 1 satisfies the inequality, therefore all values for x > (1/3) satisfy the inequality.

Putting everything together, the values for x are:
1) x < - 7, and
2) x > (1/3)
Join the discussion

by shashank.ism » Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:10 am
gary391 wrote:What are the values of X?

| 3 + 2x | > |4 - x |
lets solve it this way..
case 1 : 3+2x>0 -->x>-3/2 and 4-x>0-->x<4
so | 3 + 2x | > |4 - x | --> 3+2x > 4-x --> 3x>1 --> x>1/3.
overall : 1/3<x<4.

case2 : 3+2x>0 --> x>-3/2 and 4-x<0 --> x>4
so | 3 + 2x | > |4 - x | --> 3+2x > x-4 --> x>-1.
overall : x>4.

case3: 3+2x<0 --> x<-3/2 and 4-x>0 --> x<4
so | 3 + 2x | > |4 - x | --> -3-2x > 4-x --> x<-7.
overall : x<-7.

case 4: 3+2x<0 --> x<-3/2 and 4-x<0 --> x>4
so | 3 + 2x | > |4 - x | --> -3-2x > x-4 --> x<1/3.
overall : No such solution.

at x = 4 also inequality is correct.

so the required value is [spoiler]x <-7 U x>1/3 . [/spoiler]
My Websites:
www.mba.webmaggu.com - India's social Network for MBA Aspirants

www.deal.webmaggu.com -India's online discount, coupon, free stuff informer.

www.dictionary.webmaggu.com - A compact free online dictionary with images.

Nothing is Impossible, even Impossible says I'm possible.
Join the discussion

by VivianKerr » Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:52 am
Barry Li's explanation is excellent. Just wanted to add a visual:

Image
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion