BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Work Rate Problem

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 6:19 am
Thanked: 1 times
by saadishah » Tue Sep 27, 2016 10:37 am
Machine A and Machine B can produce 1 widget in 3 hours working together at their respective constant
rates. If Machine A's speed were doubled, the two machines could produce 1 widget in 2 hours working
together at their respective rates. How many hours does it currently take Machine A to produce 1 widget on
its own?

1. 1/2
2. 2
3. 3
4. 5
5. 6

I solved it this way. Since the change is because of the change in Machine A's rate, it's old rate would be equal to combined new rate - combined old rate i.e., 1/2 - 1/3 = 1/6

So Machine A would take 6 hours to finish the job at its old speed. Is this correct?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Problem Solving |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pmFollowed by: 511 members
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Tue Sep 27, 2016 10:51 am
Hi saadishah,

Yes, the approach that you used absolutely works. There are actually a number of different ways to answer this question (including TESTing THE ANSWERS) - so you might want to think about whether your way was the fastest and easiest method or not.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:03 pm
saadishah wrote:Machine A and Machine B can produce 1 widget in 3 hours working together at their respective constant
rates. If Machine A's speed were doubled, the two machines could produce 1 widget in 2 hours working
together at their respective rates. How many hours does it currently take Machine A to produce 1 widget on
its own?

1. 1/2
2. 2
3. 3
4. 5
5. 6
Let 1 widget = 6 units.

Since A and B take 3 hours to produce a 6-unit widget, the rate for A+B = w/t = 6/3 = 2 units per hour.
Since 2A and B take 2 hours to produce a 6-unit widget, the rate for 2A+B = w/t = 6/2 = 3 units per hour.
Rates can be ADDED and SUBTRACTED.
Thus:
A's rate = (2A+B) - (A+B) = 3-2 = 1 unit per hour.
At a rate of 1 unit per hour, the time for A to produce a 6-unit widget = w/r = 6/1 = 6 hours.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pmFollowed by: 119 members
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Thu Sep 29, 2016 7:01 pm
saadishah wrote:I solved it this way. Since the change is because of the change in Machine A's rate, it's old rate would be equal to combined new rate - combined old rate i.e., 1/2 - 1/3 = 1/6

So Machine A would take 6 hours to finish the job at its old speed. Is this correct?
Yes, and that is a very clever approach! Really nice work.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1