1000 cr

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:38 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

1000 cr

by arghya05 » Tue May 12, 2009 11:20 am
A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer’s well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the lawsuit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers’ services cost more than those of their imitators.
The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer’s rendition of a song from a good imitator’s rendition of the same song.
(B) Commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singers.
(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.
(D) Advertising firms will continue to use imitators to mimic the physical mannerisms of famous singers.
(E) The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials.

User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:39 pm
Location: Barcelona
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:640

Re: 1000 cr

by hk » Tue May 12, 2009 11:41 am
arghya05 wrote:A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer’s well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the lawsuit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers’ services cost more than those of their imitators.
The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer’s rendition of a song from a good imitator’s rendition of the same song.
(B) Commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singers.
(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.
(D) Advertising firms will continue to use imitators to mimic the physical mannerisms of famous singers.
(E) The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials.
My answer is E

Conslusion: Advertising costs will rise, since famous singers’ services cost more than those of their imitators.

A - Most ppl distinguishing a famous song has nothing to do with the conclusion
B - Effectiveness of the advertising need not be assumed to conclude that the firms' costs will rise
C - Original songs are unavailable - irrelevant
D - It refutes the reasoning which clearly states that the firms will stop using imitators in commercials

E - If the firms have to still use well known songs then they'll have to pay more for original singers and thus lead to a rise in costs.
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish

Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Tue May 12, 2009 5:00 pm
IMO - E

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 3:12 pm
Location: South Korea
Thanked: 4 times

by sadullaevd » Tue May 12, 2009 5:24 pm
IMO A must be an initial assumption.

The initial assumpsion is that people ususally cannot distinct between a real singer and imitator.

Therefore, advirsing companies choose imitators in order to down the costs.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 4:03 am

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 12:53 pm
i think it's E

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:14 am

by Brad.C » Sun May 15, 2016 1:23 pm
I would go for E as well