BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Wolves

Expert replies

by Tani » Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:43 pm
C is out of scope. We have no information about human encroachment on the wolves' territory.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by pearl_rafter » Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:37 pm
As the stem says
'what may be inferred'
I think then only possible choice is D.
Join the discussion

by akashamrev » Tue Sep 13, 2011 5:14 am
I would go with option:D,but am still confused with option D and option C can anyone please help me..??
Join the discussion

by Tani » Tue Sep 13, 2011 12:11 pm
We have no information about human encroachment on wolf territory. Therefore, although it may be true, it is not a valid inference. Given our lack of information, it is equally possible that humans have backed off and created more territory for the wolves.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by gunjan1208 » Tue Sep 13, 2011 9:18 pm
I chose D. This is a great question. Kudos.
Join the discussion

by vzzai » Tue Sep 13, 2011 9:35 pm
Thank you, Good one. Took a while but finally could arrive at the answer!
Would you rate this as a 700+ question?
Thank you,
Vj
Join the discussion

by parul9 » Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:07 am
I debated between D and E for some time.
Then, I read D the nth time, and thought of it as a conclusion of the passage, it seemed to suggest that the author was saying that wolf hunting in the in the fringes can continue (as if approving of wolf hunting), while the passage tone never seemed to give such a hint.
And hence I ended up answering as E... :(

I am still not convinced with D... though it seems the best possible choice here, but it is not a balanced conclusion.
Can someone please help with my dilemma here?
Join the discussion

by Tani » Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:25 am
E is a 180. The stimulus tells us that reproduction rates vary according to population density. That means density must vary,
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by parul9 » Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:41 am
Thanks Tani.

But when a question asks for "conclusion", then shouldn't the same be derivable from the passage without extrapolation unlike option D?
Though I get that this is the closest option, but isn't there a level of ambiguity there in this choice? Or do I need to change my thought process towards these qsns???
Join the discussion

by Tani » Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:18 am
This question asks what conclusion could be properly drawn. It is not looking for a conclusion that is already in the stimulus. That makes it an inference question and the task is, in fact, to extrapolate what MUST BE TRUE based on the stimulus.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by parul9 » Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:42 am
Noted... thanks!
Join the discussion

by artistocrat » Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:27 pm
DanaJ wrote:Source: Beat The GMAT Practice Questions

Wolves can double their numbers every year. They do not do so, however, if the area in which they live is already full and the territory of each pack borders on the territory of other packs on all sides. Lone wolves, unable to establish a territory near their place of origin, disperse to a less desirable habitat and often are hunted by people.

Which of the following conclusions may be properly drawn from the information in the passage above?

A. The number of wolves in any area suitable for wolves may be predicted to quadruple in two years.
B. Wolves are ejected from the pack to wander singly as lone wolves when the number of wolves in the pack has doubled.
C. The amount of territory suitable for wolves has been diminishing in recent years as a result of human encroachment, with a resulting diminution in the wolf population.
D. Wolf hunting can continue at a moderate rate on the fringes of a good habitat for wolves without a decrease in the average yearly wolf population in that territory.
E. The wolf population density in a given area of wolf territory does not vary with the yearly rate of wolf reproduction.
Process of Elimination if answer is not evident:

A. What if the saturation point is reached after one 2 year cycle?
B. A given wolf population may double again before it ejects lone wolves.
C. Out of Scope: Who knows the impact of human encroachment? The argument doesn't even show the impact of hunting.
D. The answer for reasons mentioned by others already.
E. The argument does not say that density and rate are not linked.

Instructors and students, please correct me if I am wrong.
Join the discussion

by juanbinaghi » Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:11 pm
..
Last edited by juanbinaghi on Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by romitvsingh » Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:18 am
never seen such a question in OG, are these real GMAT problems
Join the discussion

by immaculatesahai » Fri Nov 04, 2011 11:45 pm
+1 for D

A is wrong. It goes against the latter sentences in the stimulus. A person maybe misguided into selecting A if he is in a hurry and pays attention only to the first line.

B is wrong. The passage does not supply information regarding whether wolves are ejected from the pack or they leave at will.

C is wrong. No information regarding human encroachment in stimulus.

D is correct.

E is too strong. All the passage says is that "Wolves can double their numbers every year". The stimulus does not supply any information regarding what the original population of wolves is. If there is scope for the population to grow and double within the area, then this WILL infact increase the population density.

Hope this helps.
Join the discussion