Why you need to do well on last few questions on GMAT?

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
Thanked: 712 times
Followed by:550 members
GMAT Score:770

by DanaJ » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:46 am
zuleron wrote: 5) experimental questions: I'm still not sure. From what has been said I think you couldn't get 5 experimentals in a row anywhere. The location of the experimental is less important to me than the difficulty of the experimental. If the computer preselects experimentals without knowing how well you will score, then presumably you could be doing really well and see a basic question... or be tanking and randomly see a super hard question. This seems strange. It would make more sense if the computer tailored the experimentals to your level as you take the test.
And I'd agree with that last thing for one simple reason: on test day, after the first few 10-15 decent questions, a wave of really tricky questions hit. But in between the hard questions I saw a couple of pretty basic ones, concerning powers. I remember I was a bit confused by those, but I went on without too much thought for it.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 223
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:50 pm
Location: Philly, USA
Thanked: 76 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:750

by zuleron » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:53 am
DanaJ wrote:
zuleron wrote: 5) experimental questions: I'm still not sure. From what has been said I think you couldn't get 5 experimentals in a row anywhere. The location of the experimental is less important to me than the difficulty of the experimental. If the computer preselects experimentals without knowing how well you will score, then presumably you could be doing really well and see a basic question... or be tanking and randomly see a super hard question. This seems strange. It would make more sense if the computer tailored the experimentals to your level as you take the test.
And I'd agree with that last thing for one simple reason: on test day, after the first few 10-15 decent questions, a wave of really tricky questions hit. But in between the hard questions I saw a couple of pretty basic ones, concerning powers. I remember I was a bit confused by those, but I went on without too much thought for it.

Well, that answers my question: Don't get freaked out if you suddenly see an basic question.
Thanks!

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:00 am
It would make more sense if the computer tailored the experimentals to your level as you take the test.
That would be nice... but they literally don't have the capability to do that.

They're giving us the experimentals in order to determine, among other things, what difficulty level to assign to that question. So they literally don't have the information to assign experimentals based on your performance through the section.

(Plus, to make the research valid, they have to make sure that every question is given to a complete variety of test-takers. What if a question is given only to lower and medium-level test-takers, and they mostly get it right and everything seems fine, but it turns out that higher-level test-takers notice some flaw in the question and pick a different answer? Then you've developed a test question that lower and medium-level testers get right and higher-level testers get wrong!)
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:05 am
sorry for the double-post, but I forgot to add: zuleron, very nice summary of the general take-aways about the algorithm.

As a general rule, the best strategy is to move relatively steadily through each section. Don't get hung up on anything and don't try to do anything way too fast either. For example, when I get a quant question I know I answered in well under a minute, I do it again. If it's really that easy, I want to make sure I didn't make a mistake, because I don't want to miss a lower-level question. It may be an experimental, but if I answered it in 45s the first time, I can check my work or try it again in 30-45s and I'm still well under 2m. And I won't go over 3m on any question (or 2m on SC) anywhere on the test. If I don't have it by then, it's unlikely that I'm going to figure it out without blowing a BIG chunk of time (and the chances are pretty good that I'll still get it wrong anyway). Pick and move on.

The best thing you can do, as far as the algorithm stuff is concerned? Develop the mental ability to let something go - truly let it go, no agonizing or thinking about it on the next question - within an appropriate timeframe. Remember: it's a tennis match. Your opponent's going to win some points. Don't dwell on them. Say, "nice shot!" (and mean it!) and move on.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 223
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:50 pm
Location: Philly, USA
Thanked: 76 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:750

by zuleron » Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:43 am
"Nice Shot!"... lol!... I like that analogy...

you must have been watching the French Open women's finals...

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:02 am
I wish. Sadly, my TiVo taped the wrong channel (my channel list included a channel I don't actually get, and that channel showed the final too - and TiVo chose to tape that one instead of the channel that I do get). So I got three hours of nothing. :(
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 223
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:50 pm
Location: Philly, USA
Thanked: 76 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:750

by zuleron » Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:31 am
Well, 2moro is the one you really don't want to miss... so set your TiVo right... Go Federer!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:21 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by crejoc » Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:05 am
zuleron wrote: I have learned a great deal from the various threads on the algorithm and strategies.

1) The bisggest no-no is strings of incorrect answers.

2) The first 10 questions are only more important to the extent that doing poorly in the first 10 leaves you with fewer questions to make up for the poor start. So you might want to spend more time on the 1st 10.

3) On the other hand, spending too much time on the 1st 10 increases your risk of gettting strings of incorrect answers later on in the test as you get pressed for time. So you probably don't want to spend too much time on the 1st 10. And if you do you are going to have to guess on some questions.

4) If you are going to guess on 5 questions (say because you spent more time on the 1st 10), it is better that they be Q12, 18, 23, 29, 35 than Q33-37 because you avoid getting strings of wrong answers.

5) experimental questions: I'm still not sure. From what has been said I think you couldn't get 5 experimentals in a row anywhere. The location of the experimental is less important to me than the difficulty of the experimental. If the computer preselects experimentals without knowing how well you will score, then presumably you could be doing really well and see a basic question... or be tanking and randomly see a super hard question. This seems strange. It would make more sense if the computer tailored the experimentals to your level as you take the test.
zuleron HATS OFF TO YOU..... Well Summarised.. kudos..
And as you said it is always better to discuss an issue and find out the real truth.. that is why we all are here in this forum, that is why there is a section called 'Gmat Strategy' in BTG too... anyway nice summarisation..