BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Suger Quotas

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:28 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: India
Thanked: 1 times
by sandeep_chhabra » Wed May 14, 2008 11:37 am
Even though its a simple question, but somehow i could not get it right.

can anyone please explain why choice A is wrong?

thanks
Attachments
Verbal1_Q31.JPG
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:57 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 29 times

by netigen » Wed May 14, 2008 12:02 pm
Find the conclusion: Sugar price will not rise if the quota is removed

To weaken find an answer which tells you otherwise.

Another way to look at it:

1. Cause and effect: Cause = quota and effect = increased sugar price

To weaken look for an alternative cause for the same effect or show that effect happens but cause does not happen.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:44 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 6 times

by loki.gmat » Fri May 30, 2008 11:00 pm
answer option A is actually strengthening the argument.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 4:37 am
Thanked: 2 times

by saurabh_dce08 » Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:35 am
i guess the option A is strenghtening the argument ~
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:28 am
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:710

by airan » Tue Jun 03, 2008 8:50 am
Answer should be B. It is not E because even before the implementation of Quotas, price "OCCASIONALLY" rose. But the trend mentioned here is "ever increasing" so prices cannot drop if it is ever increasing ..!
Other's pls comment ..!
Thanks
Airan
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:26 am

by khanshainur » Tue May 10, 2016 4:19 am
My intuition whispers that it's E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1