Suger Quotas

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:28 am
Location: India
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

Suger Quotas

by sandeep_chhabra » Wed May 14, 2008 11:37 am
Even though its a simple question, but somehow i could not get it right.

can anyone please explain why choice A is wrong?

thanks
Attachments
Verbal1_Q31.JPG
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:57 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

by netigen » Wed May 14, 2008 12:02 pm
Find the conclusion: Sugar price will not rise if the quota is removed

To weaken find an answer which tells you otherwise.

Another way to look at it:

1. Cause and effect: Cause = quota and effect = increased sugar price

To weaken look for an alternative cause for the same effect or show that effect happens but cause does not happen.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:44 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by loki.gmat » Fri May 30, 2008 11:00 pm
answer option A is actually strengthening the argument.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 4:37 am
Thanked: 2 times

by saurabh_dce08 » Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:35 am
i guess the option A is strenghtening the argument ~

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:28 am
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:710

by airan » Tue Jun 03, 2008 8:50 am
Answer should be B. It is not E because even before the implementation of Quotas, price "OCCASIONALLY" rose. But the trend mentioned here is "ever increasing" so prices cannot drop if it is ever increasing ..!
Other's pls comment ..!
Thanks
Airan

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:26 am

by khanshainur » Tue May 10, 2016 4:19 am
My intuition whispers that it's E